this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
64 points (97.1% liked)
World News
32372 readers
548 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Better (Reuters) source here
Newsweek has been a rag for over a decade now.
Newsweek was a rag in 1995. It's always been slop for lower IQ boomers.
They are both rags
Why are you posting from Newsweek if you agree that it's a rag? Your post directly before this one was Reuters. Your actions don't align with what you're saying here.
Whenever I come across an interesting claim on social media, mostly Mastodon or Xitter, I search duckduckgo with its claim to find a news article with the most apt headline.
Posting articles based on the contents of their headlines rather than the quality of their content or the reliability of the source seems irresponsible.
They are all reporting on the same thing. Some will have vague headlines and some will have the actual content. The word 'atrocities' used by Newsweek is more accurate than 'military campaign' used by Reuters.