this post was submitted on 27 Nov 2024
327 points (99.4% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35592 readers
982 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Do you think there’s enough information in the application to decide? If that information is there, then you shouldn’t categorically assume AI is being racist against Einstein. Personal review of resumes is notoriously rife with bias - you actually might want to consider that AI could be an improvement. The guy with the ethnic name might get a high AI score and actually get a second look. You don’t know the AI performs worse than humans in the things you care about. Be real: you have no information about that at all.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, we already know a lot of information about this issue. It's just that no one gives a shit.

https://www.washington.edu/news/2024/10/31/ai-bias-resume-screening-race-gender/

You clearly don't or you would have looked it up first.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

Any comparison with how humans do with the same resumes in that article? Hm… nope.

The AI models are racist because they are trained on racist human generated decision sets. At least AI can be reprogrammed. Your own article concludes that this research should be used to improve AI.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Your own article concludes that this research should be used to improve AI.

What did I say above?

Believe it or not, we already know a lot of information about this issue. It’s just that no one gives a shit.

But I'm not sure why you think "less racist than a racist human but still racist" as the current status quo is acceptable.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Nice attempt to put those words in my mouth. Here’s what I think less racist than a human is: less racist than a human.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

Either it's acceptable, which is why you're defending it, or it's not acceptable, in which case you have no reason to defend it.

I'm assuming you're not just saying things in order to practice your typing, so all I can think is that you think "less racist than a human but still racist" as the status quo is acceptable.

But if you don't think it's acceptable, please explain why you're defending it.