this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2025
96 points (90.7% liked)

History

23333 readers
3 users here now

Welcome to c/history! History is written by the posters.

c/history is a comm for discussion about history so feel free to talk and post about articles, books, videos, events or historical figures you find interesting

Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember...we're all comrades here.

Do not post reactionary or imperialist takes (criticism is fine, but don't pull nonsense from whatever chud author is out there).

When sharing historical facts, remember to provide credible souces or citations.

Historical Disinformation will be removed

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Oppobrium? Latifundium? Bellicose? Effete? Really? What the fuck is wrong with these people. These words are like paragraphs apart

Edit: just read the term "professional-cum-technocratic ethos" this shit is not normal and the author should be ashamed

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Pedantic as in finding an individual example, ignoring that overall Parenti doesn't put unnecessary jargon in his work, especially compared to someone like Jordan Peterson or even Chomsky. Pedantic as in nitpicking a tiny element and ignoring the wider reality.

Were his ideas not clever enough? Is he bourgeoise? Did he change terminology afterwards?

Incredibly bad faith questions that I'm not going to answer.

[–] Huldra@hexbear.net 3 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Broadly the discussion has been very absolutist about these terms, I don't really care wether or not Parenti is "better" on a spectrum.

I want to hear what his usage of the term in his most famous lecture actually implies about him and these sorts of terms as a whole. Is this post actually a discussion about language or just a massive circlejerk about how much we dislike academics.

[–] ButtBidet@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago
[–] Speaker@hexbear.net 2 points 2 weeks ago

ITT: anti-intellectualism is revolutionary when I like it, but reactionary when I don't