this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
1219 points (99.3% liked)

Greentext

5271 readers
1847 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] RamenJunkie@midwest.social 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The people pushing these laws are hoping it will have the "California Effect."

Like when California says "Cars need to meet X emissions standards" so far makers just make cars everywhere meet those standards.

They are hoping that by making age verification a thing in a few states, it will become a thing everywhere.

This fails to realize that one, it's easy to geofence a state online (VPNs being anwork around). And Two, companies generally comply with California laws because, on the whole, California passes mostly positive limitations. It only makes the cars and world better if they all meet the better emissions standards. Blocking porn like this, is a net negative.

Also, on the subject of kids accessing porn. They are going to do it anyway, anyone thinking otherwise is oblivious to the world, and two, it's not up to the state to nanny this shit, it's up to the parents.

[–] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 7 hours ago

And Two, companies generally comply with California laws because, on the whole, California passes mostly positive limitations.

No, companies generally comply with California laws because California is a massive market. Companies don't, on the whole, operate on what is mostly positive for society according to a specific flavor of progressive.

Companies operate on what is most profitable, and selling to California is usually good for profits, while running a separate production line just for California usually isn't worth it. So if the regulations aren't too expensive to meet, they'll just switch the whole production over to meet California law because that minimizes costs and maximizes sales. The same kind of thing also happens with Texas, for much the same reason - especially with textbooks.

[–] unphazed@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

When it comes to emissions laws, car co usually build a range just for California. It's not hard to slate a few days just for a different exhaust.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I agree with all of that. What I don't agree with is blaming the entirety of the US for this policy. This is one dumbass state, doing a dumbass thing. The UK passed a similar law and I'd be just as wrong if I shit talked the rest of Europe for it.

[–] skulblaka@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

As of January 2025:

While Pornhub is not blocked in Louisiana, it is blocked in these 17 states, a Pornhub representative confirmed to Mashable:

Alabama

Arkansas

Florida

Idaho

Indiana

Kansas

Kentucky

Mississippi

Montana

Nebraska

North Carolina

Oklahoma

South Carolina

Tennessee

Texas

Utah

Virginia

In Louisiana, where users must submit ID to view Pornhub, the site has seen traffic decline by around 80 per cent, Aylo (Pornhub's parent company) told Mashable.

This is not just "Oh Florida is just being quirky again" this is systematic.

[–] iowagneiss@midwest.social 4 points 1 day ago

The UK vs EU and the states vs the USA is not apples to apples. As I understand it though, we're actually approaching 20 US states requiring such verification. Iowa is trying to pass something similar. This is a trend across the country, which is why I generalized the USA.

https://www.ipvanish.com/blog/us-age-verification-laws/