this post was submitted on 12 May 2025
625 points (97.7% liked)

politics

23457 readers
2918 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump lashed out at bipartisan critics after reports revealed he plans to accept a $400 million Boeing 747-8 jet from Qatar for use as Air Force One.

In a Truth Social post, Trump dismissed concerns as “world class losers” complaining about a transparent gift. Qatar stated the plane is under legal review between its Ministry of Defense and the Pentagon.

Critics, including Sen. Bernie Sanders, Sen. Chris Murphy, and Rep. Jamie Raskin, accused Trump of corruption and violating the Constitution.

Even allies like Laura Loomer led the MAGA pushback to the jet deal.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (2 children)

He's losing a lot of support....

One of the joys of living in a red state, is plenty of uninformed people voted for him. A shit ton of them are saying they're not voting again.

But with an actual impartial DNC chair, once we get a candidate (especially if it's a charismatic one who's economically progressive) it's gonna be easy to get them to vote D like with Obama.

But with the dnc's track record, them not voting is the best we can have right now.

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Don’t be fooled. They will fall in line again. They will vote for Trump again if they have to. They’ll have to stop [insert boogeyman here].

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

We're also on track for voting to barely matter by that point, unless something massive changes first.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I mean, in some cases these are people I've known for 20 years...

But I'm sure you know them better than I do

Nah you just underestimate the power of propaganda and cognitive dissonance.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Sounds like you're talking about a very specific anecdotal group of people, and they're talking about the general trend.

As someone also in a red state, I believe they're right in general.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

it's gonna be easy to get them to vote D

I'm not saying to give up on trying to reach them, but there're people that have never put a 'D' on a ballot in their lives. A more "moderate" Republican candidate will just be an excuse to feel justified in their hatred and bigotry again.