this post was submitted on 11 Sep 2023
942 points (96.9% liked)

Mildly Interesting

21807 readers
330 users here now

This is for strictly mildly interesting material. If it's too interesting, it doesn't belong. If it's not interesting, it doesn't belong.

This is obviously an objective criteria, so the mods are always right. Or maybe mildly right? Ahh.. what do we know?

Just post some stuff and don't spam.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] youthinkyouknowme@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 2 years ago (3 children)
[–] Redscare867@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I think they’re trying to say that less people would fly than currently drive due to the cost of flying. Although, if we subsidized personal planes at the same rate that we do personal vehicles I’m not entirely sure that flying would continue to be so expensive.

[–] Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's quite simple really. Less people would be able to fly, so those that can't will just stand still in confusion until they die from starvation. The remaining population would be the small fraction who were able to afford to fly. Net loss in pollution.

[–] Michal@programming.dev -2 points 2 years ago

Flying is expensive and you need a license that's substantially harder to get than a driver's license.