this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2023
3584 points (98.5% liked)

Fediverse

28483 readers
851 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Lemmy.ml has now blocked Threads.net

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ward@lemmy.nz 6 points 1 year ago (20 children)

Yea agree, not a fan of "Meta". But I think limiting who can use federated networks kinda goes against the federated nature of such networks. What's next, we'll have a centralized blacklist of lemmy instances.

[–] grissee@lemmy.my.id 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)
[–] profz@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is mentioned in pretty much every thread but I haven't seen anyone apply the theory to the fediverse. The second step is for threads to create features that lure people over from Lemmy (or activitypub). So are the people saying eee by extension saying they'll move to threads from their current server because threads have a bigger and better development team?

[–] grissee@lemmy.my.id 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

they'll move to threads because threads will be incompatible with the rest of fediverse (thread essentially defederate themself), and if most content is being posted in threads, they'll move there (since they can't access it from other instance)

this has happened before, such as

  • MSN messenger breaking compatibility with AOL IM (MSN wins since it got 95% market share)
  • MS Office doing obfuscation to their office file data to prevent FOSS editor like LibreOffice from rendering it correctly
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)