this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
366 points (96.7% liked)

politics

24821 readers
1872 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Zach Shrewsbury faces an improbable task to replace the conservative Democrat in the face of a Republican onslaught – but he won’t be put off

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Bernie took w Virginia over Hillary, I think if he raises enough money and communicates his message well people will respond to him. My gut says that Jim Justice will get the Republican nomination and he will be a difficult candidate to beat. He's won governor races as a Democrat and a Republican. Trump likes justice and Trump won west Virginia handedly. The odds are stacked against Shrewsbury but I still think he has a good chance if he can establish his own story and not let justice paint him as some crazy Marxist.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Maybe. But the centrists will need to vote blue no matter who, like they've been screaming at any progressive who is less than pleased with people like Manchin.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

We'll see. Turn out for the last election was the best since 1960. I think turn out will go down next year unfortunately. I truly hope I'm wrong. But I think next year is going to be a democratic massacre. People like Shrewsbury might actually turn that around. Who knows.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

People like Shrewsbury might actually turn that around. Who knows.

Well, it's clear that people like Manchin can't.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Joe manchin did win three Senate races he was also a secretary of state and governor of West Virginia. That's a lot of wins for a Democrat in West Virginia where Trump beat Biden by something like 39%. I'm not trying to tell you to like him or anything but that's impressive to me.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

He's not running for re-election because knows he can no longer win. Moving to the right has failed.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Well neither one of us knows what he's thinking and neither one of us has a crystal ball but this race is going to be a difficult run for any Democrat. Justice may very well have been able to out-Manchin Manchin. I think it's a good idea to make this a contest of completely different world views. Neither one of knows right now who would win Manchin vs Justice or Shrewsbury vs Justice.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well neither one of us knows what he’s thinking

I mean, his entire career leads me to believe that he's doing what is best for himself and only himself. If he thought he had a chance of keeping a job in which he can tell the president to kiss his ass and seriously expect him to comply, why would he instead be openly considering a run as a third party nobody?

Neither one of knows right now who would win Machine vs Justice or Shrewsbury vs Justice.

Considering one is running and the other isn't, I'd say the one who is running stands a more favorable chance against Justice.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don't know what's in Manchin's head. I don't think he wants to run as a spoiler for Biden. I think he's looking to run as a spoiler for Trump. Then again he could be talking about a presidental run just to stay in the limelight. Who knows.

I don't like saying, "manchin knows he can't win so he's not running" because I don't know that. There could be some alternate reality where he runs and beats Justice. Maybe Sanders could have beaten Trump. Maybe Trump would have beaten Sanders. My point is there's no way for us to know any of these things.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

There could be some alternate reality where he runs and beats Justice.

We're not in that reality. Manchin's time in the senate is over. And here's hoping he never holds any office ever again. He's a corrupt nutsack on his best day.

I don’t think he wants to run as a spoiler for Biden. I think he’s looking to run as a spoiler for Trump.

Sure. He's totally that altruistic. He wants, in order to spoil in favor of the guy whose agenda he blocked, to abandon his ability to continue to block it.

The simplest answer is he knows he won't win.

[–] Salamendacious@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

It's very popular among the left wing of the party to hate manchin. But I'd rather have a manchin than a markwayne mullin or a josh hawley.