this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
687 points (77.9% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2571 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] decripter37@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Since it isn't mentioned in the article, here is the reference: paper (2014)

In the study it even shows how driving a 10 years car for 6000 miles is rougly two years of saved emission with a meat->vegan switch.

I don't know, changing dietary is obviously good for the health, but these results seems to make pretty useless changes, use the bike and save twice as much.

EDIT: There is a new paper (2023), it is in a reply.

[–] smellythief@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The first line in the article says a "new study." So are you sure it's not this paper? Also, have to say the paper title is kind of a duh moment.

[–] decripter37@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks I didn't find the new one!

[–] GlycineMaxFTW@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

You can do both

[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A 2023 news article about a study published in 2014.

[–] smellythief@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TWeaK@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the correction. The author of this paper matches up with the one mentioned in the article.

However so does the other article, and it doesn't look like the recent article really presents anything new.

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't drive so maybe I just don't have context but 6,000 miles seems like A LOT.

[–] decripter37@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

On a quick search, it seems that ~10000 is the average miles per year.

[–] joonazan@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I calculated at one point that if you ride a bike instead of a car but replenish the calories with pure beef, it is better to ride the car. So diet matters.

[–] Zehzin@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

From the way you worded it, it sounds like not eating meat is five times as effective than not driving in the same time period.

Though we can always do both to any degree we can.

[–] decripter37@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry for the botchered English, it's not my first language, as you may have guessed.