this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
441 points (99.1% liked)

World News

48491 readers
1757 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rumimevlevi@lemmings.world 9 points 22 hours ago

https://www.unicef.ca/sites/default/files/2024-06/UNICEF%20_Canada_Policy_Brief_Bill_S-201_Lowering_the_Voting_Age.pdf

the “cold cognition” capacity required for voting is generally formed by age 16 and stable thereafter. A 2019 study with more than 5,000 adolescents from 11 countries found that changes in the prefrontal cortex result in two independent neural pathways for decision making: one is related to digesting information and reasoning, the other operates when choices are made impulsively.ix Tasks such as voting and working are critically related to the first neural pathway, while impulsive behaviour such as criminal activity often relates to the second pathway. A 2021 review of the literature argues that: “taken together, adolescents, on average, are capable of rational, deliberative decision-making supported by their mature cognitive capacities”.x A significant proportion of scientists in the neurodevelopmental field have argued that lowering the voting age is in line with current evidence about adolescent brain development. Many experts assert that a 16-year-old has sufficient cognitive and critical thinking capacities to make political decisions independently.xi Giving adolescents a voice and allowing their participation in matters that affect them through voting would also help fulfill a developmental need for agency and autonomy, which are core developmental tasks in adolescence.

Many young people are well informed about ballot box issues such as COVID-19, climate change, mental health, education and inequality, among other policy issues that affect their lives now and in the future. Young people also display competence in civic education initiatives and public policy related advocacy. Some studies have shown that mid-adolescents have similar levels of political knowledge as young adults. In Brazil, where 16-year-olds are eligible to vote but compulsory voting is limited to those over 18, levels of political knowledge and media consumption are indistinguishable for those above and below 18. Similarly, when the voting age was reduced from 18 to 16 in Austria in 2007, 16- and 17-year-olds were found to be as well informed as 18- to 21-year-olds.

[–] WorldsDumbestMan@lemmy.today 0 points 14 hours ago

It's best to raise it to 22, when they have some brain to work with, and cap it at 30.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It can either go terribly wrong or terribly right.

This either makes the far-right radicalize teens at an earlier age, or finally schools no longer will be for 50+ year old bitter people who want the younger generation suffer.

[–] Ghyste@sh.itjust.works 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

If the young crowd in the US is any indicator, the influence of right-wing propaganda could be very worrying.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It's the male loneliness epidemic.

Look, I will preface this by saying that I'm not an incel who thinks everyone is entitled to sex or that women should just get married and stay at home. I have to do this because there's some things coming up that could be misconstrued as a very controversial opinion on my part, whereas I'm trying to explain what some people might be feeling. I don't want to justify anything or anyone, I just want to explain my opinion of what's happening.

Long story short, people are having less sex and more crucially, dating less. Here's a source. The article surveyed men, but likely the same is true of women. But we're focusing on men for this bit anyway, since we're talking about the sudden right-wing turn of young males.

There are many reasons why people are spending more time online and less with potential romantic partners. I'm not getting into most of those. Many are valid. God knows I wouldn't want to date a potential Andrew Tate fan or a Trump voter if I was a woman. And on both sides of the gender aisle, there's new time consuming online hobbies, like gaming and doomscrolling.

This causes bitterness. I've been a teenager, and I'm still in my 20s. And I'm a dude. I can tell you that as a teenager there was a constant urge of "I wish I could get some" that masturbation could not quell for long, and once I did finally lose my virginity (well, after like the 2nd or 3rd time, everyone knows the first time is shit), I knew I wanted more of that and less of my hand. Luckily for me, I spent my late teen years in a stable relationship with a girl whose drive was also pretty high so we definitely had days of 4-5 sessions. As I've aged, I've calmed down on that front, there's been an entire calendar year or 2 where I didn't get any in my mid-late 20s, as I don't have a lot of game, or free time.

Enough about me though, that was just to point out that young dudes can get ridiculously horny*. But horny is just one issue. You can usually get by with a good ol' session of pocket billiards. But of course in your teens at least, you've been conditioned by shitty Hollywood teen coming-of-age movies to link sex with success as a male. And then there's shows like HIMYM, Friends, Seinfeld, whatever - the main characters are ALWAYS dating someone.

Now on to dating. That's the big elephant in the room. A lot of women nowadays have realized they don't need some asshole hanging around their home. Much more interesting to get an education, build a career to be proud of. Gives you a lot more freedom compared to the traditional wife. So a lot fewer women are dating in their 20s. Those that are dating - well, they just get to be pickier. It's a matter of supply vs demand, to put it extremely bluntly.

Apps make it even worse. Women on apps get to be extremely picky and receive hundreds or even thousands of matches with average looks in a big city, while men are happy to get into the tens. Why? Well, because there are a ton of horny dudes looking for just sex, and they devalue all the other men. Again, supply vs demand. A good saying I heard was "Men on Tinder are looking for fresh water in the desert, women on Tinder are looking for fresh water in the ocean". It sucks for everyone, unless you're looking for meaningless casual sex as a woman. Tons of that available for women. Hard to find anyone to actually date though and it seems that part applies for both genders. Especially because the apps' algorithms don't want you to find true love. The goal is to keep you on the app.

Another good reason for all this is the lack of the Third Place. I think the US is particularly bad in this regard, with suburban hell where you just have nowhere to go hang out and meet new people. No meeting new people in real life = you're stuck with the horrible reality of dating apps if you want to meet potential partners, or even just new friends. Here in my corner of Europe, we have mixed zoning mostly and walkable cities, so it's easier to just go walk to a bar, sit down, talk to other people who show up. No need to drive or order a rideshare.

So now we've established that young people aren't having much sex or dating. Why does that make people young men in particular go conservative? Well it's simple, really. It's the fucking tradwife thing. Society makes you feel like you're worthless if you don't date or have sex, so you feel lonely, maybe you don't even have any female friends. I know I didn't until I was like 15 or so, I was scared of talking to the girls. So you know jack shit about women as actual human beings, only know what you've consumed in the media, which objectifies women anyway, and you've got these shitty role models that tell you you as a man deserve an obedient woman, someone who doesn't talk back and does the chores and was a virgin before you. You absolutely fucking don't, nobody deserves a bangmaid. But we've got all these incels and that ideology just clicks with them. Of course they feel like they deserve what their forefathers had. That we should go back to a society before women had any agency. Etc. It's stupid as fuck, and it comes from indoctrination of lonely people. They're just looking for someone to blame, and an easy solution for their issues. That's always an easy thing for propaganda to make use of.

So what IS an actual solution? Some will say therapy, but it's pretty difficult to make millions of people realize they could use some. Nor are there enough therapists in the world for everyone to get therapy. Plus I don't think therapy is the end-all be-all solution for all the mental health issues the world is suffering from. I think the best solution, and I have no idea how this could be implemented, would be to just promote more inter-gender socialization in schools, kindergarten, etc. Just give young boys growing up every possible chance of making female friends. Not because those female friends are potential future romantic partners, but because I think a lot of guys just really need to understand women more and how can you understand them if you've never had any in your life as equals, as friends, hopefully close ones? I know I changed a lot as a person when I finally actually had some girls as friends. Learned to be more empathetic for sure.

Last, but not least: Us guys need to be there for each other more too. Ask your friends what's wrong. Hell, if your friend's been looking down for a while and doesn't want to open up, get him moderately drunk, but don't pry too hard. Let him open up on his own. Be supportive, don't offer solutions unless asked for. You may save someone's life.

TL;DR: Problem is incels. But that's an oversimplification and the incels themselves are not the root cause. Problem is loneliness and a bunch of men who don't necessarily understand women. It should really be fixed BEFORE these men grow up to be bitter incels. I bet most of them could do with more and closer friends in general too, not just female friends.

* I have of course been lead to believe by a feminist friend of mine that the same applies for women, but due to societal pressure, they're more likely to hide that part, possibly even from themselves. She may very well be right, given how slut shaming shapes women to be less open about sexuality, resulting in less fun for everyone involved.

[–] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

Is there a reason to call it "male loneliness epidemic" instead of just "loneliness epidemic"?

Isn't the male part actually a reaction to the "fascist youth indoctrination" mentioned above? The modern fascism pushed by the anti-woke "intellectual dark web" is fundamentally a belief in inequality based on identity like sex, gender or race. Which is incompatible with dating emancipated women if based on sex, and causes problem when dating materialistic women who seek beauty or wealth.

So part of the problem is fascism. And the other part is neoliberalism, making raising children so expensive that it forces people to strongly consider wealth of partners before other attributes. That and the other things you mentioned of course, or an identity fueled by social media self marketing.

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

For all twelve 16 year olds who actually care about voting

Edit: Not to say they shouldn't be, this comment was not meant as gatekeeping, more so that the youth typically have little interest in voting, which is a huge problem.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 day ago

As someone who voted for Nick Clegg in their first ever general election vote, I think it's important that we shatter our youth's idealism early and often.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 96 points 2 days ago (11 children)

Not gonna lie, I don't think that I was mature enough at sixteen for my opinion to have mattered on a macro scale.

[–] Mustard@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Braindead inbred fucks from the midlands who worship the Daily Mail as gospel can vote, so I'm not worried about the kids.

[–] froh42@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago

When my son turned 16 and my daughter was 18 I had that discussion with them, as I'm a supporter of being allowed to vote with 16.

My 16y old son was against it "Look at all my friends, they don't inform themselves and everyone would been voting for some shit party that promises something"

My answer to that is, most people do. "Being qualified" is not a condition for being able to vote. Yes, there's a line you cross when you grow up, a toddler obviously can't vote yet, an adult can.

But in the end it's arbitrary where you put that line and by moving it down to 16 you can "a bit" influence the relative large weight of older generations in elections.

When I vote, I'll have to live with the consequences for 30y in the best case before I'm worm food. For my kids the number is over 60y.

So regardless of "how qualified to vote" you are, moving down the election age changes the decision making to be of longer term and less of short term.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Most people aren't mature enough their entire lives, but we don't filter them out.

[–] brown_guy45@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

That's the shittiest part. Honestly some people don't deserve to vote, they just lack critical thinking

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Barrington@feddit.org 88 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But do you think you cared more about the future than someone who is 70?

Is voting selfish reasons at 16 naturally better than someone doing the same at 80?

I agree, I probably didn't know enough at the time to make the most informed choice but I was definitely more idealistic, and I think that would have been a good thing.

Also, will there her more policy aimed at improving the lives of 16+ knowing they can vote.

I think the positives out way any downside.

[–] iAmTheTot@sh.itjust.works 38 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Honestly no, I was a twat at sixteen. But I acknowledge that I'm speaking for myself.

[–] Barrington@feddit.org 20 points 2 days ago

I appreciate your honesty. I would have to say I was still a twat when I started to vote, and was for a long time after.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] troglodyke@lemmy.federate.cc 7 points 1 day ago

Sure, but I want mature enough at 18 either. A lot of people aren't mature enough at 40 to fully comprehend what they're voting for. We don't enfranchise people with votes based on their level of knowledge though, we do it if they're considered active members of society - and 16 year olds are considered adults in a large amount of their day-to-day life

[–] bampop@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

I know I wasn't mature enough, but if being well informed, politically conscious and sensible were a prerequisite for voting, we'd be living in a very different world. As far as I'm concerned, this is most likely to change things for the better.

I was the weird kid who was more politically informed than the average adult, but I'd read the newspaper daily since about 12 or so. Maturity IDK but there are many adults that are less mature than I was.

[–] kebab@endlesstalk.org 17 points 2 days ago

Don’t worry, now teens have TikTok which they can source their information from, so we should be safe

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 44 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Seems convenient that it's happening now, under a conservative Labour PM, at the same time that data show that the generation currently around the age of 16 is generally more conservative than their parents.

But aside from that, this seems like a good thing.

[–] sunbytes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think it's going to completely change how schools are managed.

If some politicians decide to cater to 17 year olds about improving school funding or safety or regulation... we might see changes not based on fear (or they might just stop degrading due to lack of attention).

I think we see a reform manifesto pledge to 'bring back good, honest turkey twizzlers' to school canteens 🙃

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

But aside from that, this seems like a good thing.

I'm really not sure about that, even if not considering the relation of people from that age to personalized manipulative social media.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Maybe but electoral outcomes can take decades to work out the consequences they have to live with, so it makes some sense.to allow them to have a voice.

When i voted my first time at 18 i wasn't engaged in either the process or the candidates, it took another couple years, so maybe by the time they're 18-20 they will take it seriously and be more engaged rather then by the time i was 22-24.

As a 60 yr old, lefty, I don't think an 80 yr old should have the vote. They had their chance for many, many decades.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gonzo-rand19@moist.catsweat.com 20 points 2 days ago (9 children)

If you pay (edit: income) tax, you should have the right to vote. I'm not convinced by all of the catastrophizing about it. Turning 16 unlocks a lot of rights and privileges in the UK and I have faith that teenagers won't be the reason that quality of life worsens.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] genevieve@sh.itjust.works 73 points 2 days ago (19 children)

“The government said it was a reform to bring in more fairness for 16- and 17-year-olds, many of whom already work and are able to serve in the military. It brings the whole of the UK voting age to 16. Scotland and Wales have already made the change for Holyrood and Senedd elections, as well as local council elections.”

Great logical reform.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›