this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2025
20 points (100.0% liked)

Fediverse

817 readers
4 users here now

Downvote are limited to members of this community

Welcome!

Can you imagine, years ago how the internet was before? We know Facebook, Twitter, Tiktok, Youtube. We knew blogger, Tumblr, Skyrock... and long before, it was the forum era as phpBB..and mail-lists.

And now with ActivityPub, we are reshaping the web, and achieving much with lots of freedom. So thank you all, and welcome ๐ŸคŸ๐Ÿ˜

Our thread

Wiki

Ressources

Related communities

If you want to donate, double check on the official website and report any problem to mod team

Social network

Threadiverse

Blog

Microblog

Event

Mediaverse

Audio

Streaming/live

Book

Culture review

Picture

Short-video

Video


Image Credits :
Avatar : Wikipedia Eukombos
Banner : David Revoy licence : CC-BY-4.0

Rules

Moderation process
We all make mistakes,

If your comment is reported, and brings up a complex issue, we will reach out to you and ask you to rephrase it.

Our goal, is to create a serene space for discussion. Nothing more.

If the post isn't edited to remove hurtful language element, we will have to remove it. It would be a shame because your comment was interesting and you took some time to write it.

In case of xenophobia, racism, transphobia, homophobia or harassment, it will be a permanent ban.

founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Related to recent events:

So Lemmy, for some reason, just copied Reddit's whole model wholesale, which honestly isn't the best. Reddit was a neat design and had the advantage of scalability, but the clever people at Reddit either got driven into the background by the chodes or hounded completely out of existence by the feds, and it stagnated after initially being a successful nice place to converse.

There are better models to draw from. Slashdot was way bigger than Lemmy, and the system was that votes were given out in tiny batches of a handful of votes, randomly, maybe once every couple of months to each one of a big population of active users. Not everyone could vote, and no one could vote on any kind of big scale or control when they had input. The votes on comments on any given post would be determined by a couple dozen randomly selected users, not just whoever felt like being most vocal. That meant the votes on any given comment would generally range from +5 to -2 (they were actually capped to that range), and almost all the comments just sat at 1 (or 2 if you were an established user, I think, or 0 if you were algorithmically determined to be a dickhead a lot of the time). There would be a few +5 comments in the big posts, and it was fine, they were usually worth listening to. Anyway, the point is that they put some thought into how to prevent people from just making 100 accounts and spamming votes, and how to surface good content in a way that couldn't be gamed very easily. There were roles equivalent to "moderators" on Lemmy/Reddit, but they were very rarely used, because the impact of votes was just a lot better managed and so mods weren't needed nearly as much.

Lemmy / Reddit's solution to all of this is to give out unlimited votes to every single free-to-create account, and then put it on the shoulders of the mods and admins to realize when someone's abusing the system in obvious ways, and also trust that those people will never be clever enough to conceal it from the admins (which they will be able to if they are clever). Also there will be some collateral damage in terms of people getting punished for downvoting a dozen of someone's comments one day which arguably they should be allowed to do.

Basically what I'm saying is, there are fundamental problems with the ease of account creation and then letting people make inputs to the whole system that can be friendly or malicious from their free accounts, and then after the fact making all the admins play whack-a-mole with anyone who wants to abuse the system. It's not sustainable. It also causes a lot of drama while the admins are (very valiantly, don't get me wrong) making the attempt.

Another good system that is generally very well regarded is Something Awful. An account costs cash money, a one-time $10 fee I think, and if you're a douchebag to a sufficient level you can get your account permabanned and then of course just like Lemmy there is no way to prevent you from making another one, but you're out ten bucks. That seems to work very well; the SA forums generally are known to have very lively discussion but it stays generally on the rails. They're also extremely strict about some things that I really wish the Lemmy mods would be more strict about: For example, if in order to keep an argument going you start pretending someone else in the argument is saying something that they aren't saying, just so you can scream at them and into the void about this thing you're pretending they're saying, you get banned. It's wonderful. That's one of my least favorite things that a certain Lemmy contingent loves to do. I think it's generally a temp ban when you do it on SA, you're not out your $10, but it's not just an encouraged and protected and celebrated thing like it is on Lemmy. (I actually have been playing with the idea of making a politics forum on Lemmy that works that way, my only hesitation is that (a) it sounds like work (b) Lemmy already has a sufficiency of politics forums.)

Anyway, I don't think any of this is realistic to do on Lemmy. It seems like we're pretty much set on what the system is, objectively bad though it is. I'm just throwing out ideas for whatever the next thing is, and for people to keep in mind when they're dealing with any of the inevitable drama that's associated with the current system.

(Oh, also making people put in their emails when they sign up for a Lemmy account isn't much more than a speed bump to someone who wants to abuse things. It doesn't stop anyone who has even the vaguest motivation to try to fake up a bunch of new accounts (because making new emails takes seconds), but it does stop someone who wants to have solid privacy and anonymity when they're using Lemmy (because making new emails that are totally divorced from your identity if some agency really wants to come after you is actually a little difficult.))

That's all I got, cheers mate

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Snoopy@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thank you both for sharing your ideas about the voting system. I really enjoy reading text like that. ๐Ÿ˜

[โ€“] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Haha thank you. I like to hear myself talk so it works out.

[โ€“] Snoopy@piefed.social 1 points 22 hours ago

I also shared on Piefed zulipchat because it is a hot topic with private voting, federated vote or not... :)

[โ€“] remotelove@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Let's dig in! While I don't agree with implementing any of those systems, I still upvoted this post for the relevancy it has to Lemmy.... Let's get back to that in a sec.

I think all the voting systems above are basically the same. You have incentive (dopamine rewards for upvoted posts and is a helluva motivator; a sense of responsibility with limited votes), a penalty (down votes) for shit posts and possibly a reward for better posts or behavior (not losing $10; "reddit gold"; high karma) [I could go on for hours about this, but I'll spare you.]

All those three systems above do is fiddle with the same knobs and are effective in their own ways.

In the case of Slashdot, I would speculate they used a "vote economy" system to encourage quality and a sense of responsibility. Reddit just wants more dopamine and Something Awful just found a way to punish trolls and make money at the same time.

Quick past recap: What Reddit voting was rumored to do (and never really did), was elevate good posts and bury bad ones. This works when you have a collection of like-minded folks that share a the same goal of ensuring good quality information. You liking or hating a post shouldn't have any relationship to how you vote on the post.

Mainly because of Facebook, we have a broken association to "liking" and "upvoting". It is what it is, but it kinda makes a point that people generally vote with emotions, not a sense of responsibility.

I believe we need to find the holy grail: identity effective incentives for "proper" voting based on content, eliminate dopamine-based systems (in regards to vote quantities or bullshit gold/silver rewards) while still providing a reward for participation. That's still "dopamine", but a reward system may need to be decoupled from the number of votes a post gets. Most of all, there needs to be an aspect of fun as well and additional incentives to return the next day.

(If you think the above paragraph sounds contradictory, it's because it is. You can't eliminate brain chemistry or emotions as a factor in this topic, even though I clearly wish I could.)

The elimination of exploitive financial incentives for creating bots and bulk accounts (with the intent of selling high karma accounts) was mostly eliminated on Lemmy, and it's awesome.

Do I personally believe that a "perfect" voting system can be created online? Nope. However, I would kindly ask for you to brainstorm about what could eliminate voting systems completely.

Edit: I am not a psychologist or some shit like that and the premise of vote systems already has been studied all to hell. There are likely much better ways to describe the psychological impacts of vote rewards, but I believe I have the basics down.

[โ€“] PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah. That's one thing I really liked about the Slashdot voting explanations (and their whole system), it indoctrinated a sense of responsibility. There's a whole separate issue where the "free account" model sort of creates a sense of entitlement where no one really has to take any good care of the space.

Also yeah, the whole issue of votes as dopamine-delivery systems, versus votes as ways to surface good content, as two very different things. I feel like they're both good aspects to the system, but they are separate things that are a little bit tangled together right now.