this post was submitted on 21 Jan 2024
1007 points (96.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54716 readers
304 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

In the end, the KIA car company made its cars into subscription models, I really hate this because in the end the car we buy with our own money doesn't feel like it belongs to us. Should we finally buy an old school car ? so as not to be affected by this subscription models or is there a way to crack the software installed in it ?

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Hootz@lemmy.ca 12 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I miss when you didn't need a cell connection for remote start, like my fob can lock and unlock my car from the third floor of my building why can't I just have a button on my remote that does the same as unlocking my doors.

Although, the roadside kinda makes $60 a year worth it just for the peace of mind, gotta atleast give em that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RanchOnPancakes@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

If it makes you feel slightly better I pay about $70/year for AAA so thats about half of the cost there since it comes with Roadside assistance.

[–] shalva97@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (8 children)

To find a car and control it remotely will need a server. That's why it's not free.

it looks like only way is to somehow imitate their API and change those links in the car. I think it would be cool to selfhost such server.

[–] joemo@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 10 months ago (5 children)

So there's two different "remote" actions. One would be using a key fob and the other through an app. I sincerely hope that the unlock/lock, start/stop through the key fob is always free and these charges are for some sort of app. However 150 yearly seems quite expensive unless there's some neat features that aren't in the screenshot.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CheezyWeezle@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I can understand some of these features requiring a $5/month subscription. Anything more than that is absolutely insane. With roadside assistance (depending on what that actually entails) I could see that sevice being bumped to $15-$20 a month,

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Grayox@lemmy.ml 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Tesla's run on Linux and have already been jailbroken, the future is now.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] pete_the_cat@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Kia's just suck in general AFAIK. My friend has a 2010 Kia Sorento and he has some "device" on top of the positive (?) terminal of his battery. The terminal ring is a bit loose so it doesn't make proper contact with the battery terminal and he has to hold it against it so that he can start his car.

I thought he was bullshitting me at first because he's not a car guy and told me before that when his car was fucking up that it was the transmission, but it was the coil packs. Nope, there's a big black box on the top of the battery and he said that only Kia can service it, and it'll cost like $800 to fix.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 9 points 10 months ago

The care package with roadside assistance seems reasonable, though your insurance usually already cover road assistance. The plus package is insane though, they charge that much just to enable remote start via their app?

[–] DTFpanda@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I really hope my '01 4Runner lasts forever

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Time to begin the era of the DYI automobile. Buy a number of ~30v, high amperage batteries, an electric motor, jury rig the thing to a drivetrain and presto!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snekerpimp@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Just buy used and modify yourself with the tech you want. Send a message that this shit is unacceptable and we are willing to live in a less technologically enhanced world if it means no subscriptions. We keep buying it, they will continue to think this is how you “extract profit” from consumers.

[–] dog_@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

They also made them easy to steal!

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.one 7 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I just Googled and the 2024 Telluride has an MSRP of ~$55,000 in my area, used 2023 models are about ~$45,000.

Looking at an auto loan calculator, that's between $700 and $900 per month with a 96 month 9% auto loan.

Point is, if you can afford the car you're probably not worrying about the subscription except on principle. If you can afford the car and have principle concerns you'd probably buy a different car.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] MashedTech@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

What happens when the car becomes too old and they decide to drop that version of the API the car is talking with? Huh? That's another problem with these with "critical service but it can only go through us", when they change their mind you get fucked.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] SpiceDealer@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'm trying to reduce my car dependency and go car-free eventually but If I had to buy one more car it would be a pre-1995 Toyota pickup.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I think the mid-2010s models should be bullshit-free while having most of the modern features (e.g. fuel efficiency)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›