Can we now link the Republicans to Russia and call it for sure? Like how long is this going to continue? Until Russia wins and America goes into civil war?
this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
170 points (95.7% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2468 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Now? A handful went over there for the fourth of July years ago.
Yeah but like they're still taking trips to yank that Kremlin scrotum. Absolutely fornicating with foreign interests.
Until proven otherwise we all lost already.
"Why should I not root for Russia, which I am."
I mean is there any real question? The guy in Montana had it right. He's a horrible person.
Why else would he go to Moscow in fucking February ? He's not there for the weather....
Does anyone ever go to Moscow for the weather?
Smart Republicans go to Moscow in July. I hear it's a great place to spend the 4th....
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/06/626664156/gop-senators-spend-july-4-in-moscow
I just assumed he was there to get his annual review.
It is the only reason he would be there.
Carlson's loyalty to Putin is just an act. He's really there to assassinate Putin on Biden's orders.
Goddamit I wish that was true.
Imagine in the middle of his interview, Tucker LEAPS up and straddles Putin, tea-bagging him while plunging a frozen shard of Swanson TV dinner (chicken pot pie) into his guts repeatedly, all the while singing ‘Walking on Sunshine’.
I'd love to see it happen, might even put it on one of those digital picture frames on an endless loop. Putin will probably get greenscreened over a body double though (to avoid issues with passing through solid objects).
We need to start this conspiracy theory. Tucker is actually a deep deep state asset working as a double agent on Bidens behalf.
Does someone not like the idea of using their insanity and ability to believe anything against them? Too bad because it's time to fight fire with fire. Let's get them thinking they don't know who to trust because everyone (including themselves) are part of the deep state conspiracy.
Let's get them thinking they don't know who to trust because everyone (including themselves) are part of the deep state conspiracy.
I think you're a little late to the party on that one.
I don't think so. They are definitely on the path to having the equivalent of a logic circuit burnout but they aren't there just yet and we need to stoke that fire.
They can keep him.
Too bad he is useless as a hostage since nobody would be willing to pay to get him back
Can we pay them to keep him instead?
why else would he vesit russia?
This is the best summary I could come up with:
On Sunday, a Telegram channel considered close to Russian law enforcement reported Carlson had flown into Moscow from Istanbul three days earlier.
The post, published by Mash, included two photos, supposedly showing Carlson at an airport and another at Moscow’s Bolshoi Theater, where he was said to have attended а ballet performance on Sunday.
It added that, if it comes about, it would be Putin’s first sit-down interview with a Western journalist since his “special military operation” against Ukraine was launched almost two years ago.
Another channel belonging to the RIA state news agency wrote that in past interviews with American journalists, Putin had to defend himself against various “accusations.”
“Maybe he’ll be more lucky with Tucker Carlson — it is said the TV host, who openly sympathizes with Russia, has come here in the hope of talking to Putin,” the post said.
But Peskov didn’t discount the possibility of an in-depth interview with a Western journalist in the future, saying: “Whether or not Carlson will be among the potential candidates, we’ll have to wait and see.”
The original article contains 396 words, the summary contains 170 words. Saved 57%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!