They’re taking the “we’ll get him off by letting him die of natural causes” approach at trial scheduling.
this post was submitted on 18 Aug 2023
131 points (97.1% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2245 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
More like "another shot at the presidency so he can got off free and then some"
Even the commentators about the Georgia case, with currently 19 defendants, are saying two years. This case has one defendant, and is much tighter than the GA case. And this request comes after Trump openly and publicly committed witness tampering against a witness in the GA grand jury, as well as casting aspersions on the judge for the DC case.
This is not a proposal in good faith, it only exists to create conflict that has to be dealt with, and I hope that Judge Chutkan calls that out.
Nothing Trump has ever done has been in good faith.
They're proposing a ridiculous date expecting to "compromise" on after the election.
Judge rules on the date on 8/28, and she's made a point of saying any sillyness and nonsense will get it going faster, not slower.
It will definitely be a 2024 start date, but I don't see it finishing before the election.
Lol. Because saying January 20, 2025 would be too suspicious.
Here's hoping at least one of his trials starts January 5th or 8th, 2024. Sadly, 06 Jan 2024 is a saturday and lawyers don't work weekends.
It’s nice to see that they can still have a sense of humor despite facing overwhelming odds.
There's nothing funny about obstruction of justice.
You sound like a lot of fun
Nah fam. These need to happen before the election. If dude gets within 10 million votes of the white house we will see violence. There is no other criminal cases in US HISTORY more important than the ones involving Trump.
Did you say 2023? September 2023? Okay, sure!
Well, if he's going to push it that far back, he's going to need to work out his court date with warden of whatever a Georgia State prison he's living in.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Aug 17 (Reuters) - Lawyers for Donald Trump on Thursday asked a federal judge in Washington to schedule an April 2026 trial for the former president, on federal charges that he allegedly sought to overturn his 2020 election loss to Democrat Joe Biden.
That requested date would place the trial after the November 2024 U.S. election, in which Trump is the front-runner for the Republican nomination.
"The public interest lies in justice and fair trial, not a rush to judgment," Trump's attorneys wrote on Thursday.
U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith, whose office is prosecuting the federal 2020 election case against Trump, last Thursday asked U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan to schedule a trial to start on Jan. 2, 2024.
That date is two weeks before the first votes are cast in the 2024 Republican presidential primary.
A spokesperson for Smith on Thursday declined to comment beyond that earlier court filing.
I'm a bot and I'm open source!
Good bot.
Let him wait as long as he wants to wait. In detention though.
He has a right to a timely trial, just not too timely, ok?
As has already been expressed in this very DC case, the right to a speedy trial applies not only to the defendant, but to the public, upon whose interest the charges were filed.
HAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA...umm, I mean, really?
Numb-nut chucklefucks, the lot of'em.