this post was submitted on 15 Sep 2024
850 points (99.2% liked)

News

23367 readers
3091 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 288 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I'm glad we've taken care of the access to guns and made progress on the societal issues that led to school shootings in the past 12 years, and that they're no longer common.

Oh, wait, we didn't do either of those things?

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 155 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Columbine was 25 years ago, those 'kids' are in their 40s now and nothing's changed.

Edit: not saying it was their responsibility to fix it, just that the school shooting stuff has been a reality for a whole generation.

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 44 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Something definitely broke in society around that time though, and "access to guns" only describes an outlet or mechanism, and not the underlying problem.

Pre-1968, civilians could buy full auto machineguns. At one point in the 1930s the Sears catalog would send a full auto Tommy Gun straight to your house via mail order with no background check. And yet in those eras the idea of a grand spectacle suicide/homicide event would have been absolutely unthinkable, even among the most disposessed in society.

The root problem is something more like cultural narcissm, for lack of a better word.

The concept of a deep cynical anti-hero move like publicly murdering pseudo-random aquaintances is a relatively modern problem. Maybe we need to do a better job suppressing "main character vibes" and narcissism, the acting out and sociopathy that is prevalent now.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 18 points 2 months ago (2 children)

At one point in the 1930s the Sears catalog would send a full auto Tommy Gun straight to your house via mail order with no background check. And yet in those eras the idea of a grand spectacle suicide/homicide event would have been absolutely unthinkable, even among the most disposessed in society.

Ummmm...

https://www.historynet.com/how-1930s-american-gang-violence-paved-the-way-for-gun-control/

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.io 10 points 2 months ago (5 children)

I mean nobody was talking about gang violence here.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yes I'm not saying there was zero violence in society. There were things like Al Capone's St. Valentines Day Massacre, Bonnie and Clyde, the Kansas City Union Station shootout, etc. but these were extreme outliers in society at large and were international news because of it.

What is relatively new is the concept of an average student or worker becoming disgruntled and deciding to mass murder peers in a singular incident, usually with some grandiose manifesto attached to it.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

School shootings in particular are a "new thing" - I'll grant that. But in general gun violence in the US is definitely not a new thing.

EDIT: Also - schools shooting today are actually still "extreme outliers" on the order of the gang violence of the '30s. They're far more common than they should be, but they're still pretty rare given the number of schools in the US.

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

for every school shooting there's like 5 "school lockdown because of unidentified person on campus"

[–] skuzz@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bath_School_disaster

People could also buy dynamite pretty easy, this was a 1927 school killing.

Crazy finds a way, however the frequency uptick these days is bonkers. Regardless of the device used to kill, I (with no evidence) think a lot of general community fracture has occurred over the last decades, people now have internet echo chambers reinforcing stupid ideas at a much higher accessibility, and foreign actors manipulating the general public. The local communities are more distanced as people choose their online pockets.

Can't downplay the firearm aspect though. The AR-15 is ridiculously easy to shoot with no formal training and easy to hit a tight grouping at 20 yards the first time you pick it up. Other firearms require more skill and training to be remotely as effective. This drops the barrier to entry so low that any asslarper can pick one up and go murder a ton of people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Something definitely broke in society

Population density has increased dramatically, more people in constant contact = more conflict with opportunities to escalate.

We should let people out in the middle of Alaska carry GAU-10s if they want, and if you live in a city you shouldn't be allowed to carry a handgun.

It's a question of risk assessment, crazy people have a rough normal distribution, but are significantly more dangerous when armed in dense population centers.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

We should let people out in the middle of Alaska carry GAU-10s if they want, and if you live in a city you shouldn’t be allowed to carry a handgun.

There's precedence for this, as most towns in the Old West would require people to check in their guns when they arrived.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

If you can carry a GAU-8 Avenger, which is traditionally mounted in an A-10 Warthog, no one is going to stop you.

[–] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Damn, I conflated the two numbers. I am shame.

[–] ouRKaoS@lemmy.today 3 points 2 months ago

No worries, the air guard base near me flies A-10s, so I see them all the time & nerd out about them a little.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Physics might. No one else could.

[–] TriPolarBearz@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

GAU-10s if they want

I am heavy weapons guy

No, I am heavy weapons guy

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pre-1968, civilians could buy full auto machineguns. At one point in the 1930s the Sears catalog would send a full auto Tommy Gun straight to your house via mail order with no background check.

Slight correction, between '30-'68 you could still get full auto thompsons mailed to you at 12yo (if you had the dough, of course). The GCA of 1968 is what gave us the background checks, and they became instant in the 90s thanks to the internet. Full auto wasn't banned (yes yes I know "technically it isn't banned.." yeah it basically is) until 1986.

And high profile murders did happen but it was mostly stuff like the Valentines Day Massacre, the SLA killing the first black superintendent, Kennedy, Lennon, y'know, not school shootings.

That said I agree with your assessment.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Pre-1968, civilians could buy full auto machineguns. At one point in the 1930s the Sears catalog would send a full auto Tommy Gun straight to your house via mail order with no background check. And yet in those eras the idea of a grand spectacle suicide/homicide event would have been absolutely unthinkable, even among the most disposessed in society.

OK this is not true. Firstly I seriously, SERIOUSLY doubt that Sears ever did that in the 1930s. I looked up the Sears-Roebuck catelogs from 1897 to 1926 (as much as I could find online) and I learned some surprising things.

Firstly, prior to WW1, the Sears-Roebuck catalog absolutely DID sell firearms, including handguns, to anyone with no questions asked. The handgun section in the 1912 catalog was quite exciting to look at if you are the type of person who likes old school handguns. Ammunition was also sold without any requirements other than money.

And besides handguns, the rifles and shotguns section was also quite good for just about everything that a North American sport shooter/hunter would want.

But after 1912? People started complaining that many criminals were using the catalog to get handguns and it was starting to worry people (in the 1910s and 1920s the crime rate was starting to rise rapidly) and so in 1918 handguns were no longer available for 'just cash'. They started selling handguns to only people who proved that they were legally permitted to own and carry a handgun, and you needed to provide a signed letter from a local sheriff or mayor or other authority figure that knew you, and by 1922 the handgun section shrunk to a single page and after that Sears no longer sold handguns.

The long gun section, however, remained as is. So yes, if you wanted a rifle or shotgun (even a semi-auto rifle or shotgun, which were around back then and sold by the catalog) you could buy it no questions asked.

The first federal gun law in the US wasn't the NFA in 1934. It was earlier in 1927 that forbade mail-order handguns.

The National Firearms Act in 1934 very strictly controlled fully-automatic guns. There was no way, NO WAY, any seller could find a 'mail-order' loophole to bypass it.

[–] Thebeardedsinglemalt@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

IIRC one of the Columbine survivors was a student during the Virginia Tech shooting...

[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Well shit… now I feel old. I was almost 30 when that happened.

[–] theangryseal@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago

Being in school was wild when that happened. My school banned baggy pants over night and required us to carry clear backpacks. We weren’t allowed to carry more than the book we needed for the next class, and cameras went up.

I was overheard telling a friend (jokingly) that I was going to kill myself if I had to take another timed test. Police showed up soon after and handcuffed me. Some girl overheard me and swore I said I was going to kill other people. Luckily one of the officers was from my neighborhood and believed me, but I was still suspended and he drove me home.

You know what really sucks though? All these years later and people are still terrified. Last week I woke up a few minutes after my teenage daughter got on the bus, my wife said, “Maybe you should go get her. Someone has threatened to shoot up the school.” I drove over and got her, fortunately the officer guarding the door just let her leave with me and was understanding. A day later and another threat hits. Someone says they’re going to shoot up the pep rally. I didn’t send her to school. Two unexcused absences in one week at the beginning of the school year over that shit.

She did online school last year and it was a nightmare, but I’m all over the place on that right now. I want her to be able to make friends and things. It wasn’t healthy for her last year. I only did that because her mom had recently died and I wanted to give her a break from everything.

I guess some kids thought it would be funny to do that last week. I just wish no one had to take them seriously.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Consider that those shootings are getting way more frequent. We get a Columbine about four times a year now and around 43 other shootings where there might be only injuries or singular casualties. Kids grow up in the States with lockdown drills. That entire voting block is going to be old enough to vote in 12 years.

I expect anti gun sentiments are growing now as each year new voters are growing up in that system where these events aren't considered rare anymore. Where parents who came of age in the 2000's have kids and are now front row to that milliterization and afraid because their families have skin in that game.

These laws are gunna happen one day.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 418_im_a_teapot@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Over 400 school shootings since Columbine. We as a society have failed our children.

....my first reaction was going 'Wait, only 400?' immediately followed by 'Jesus christ, 400.'

I'm not sure which of those is actually worse.

[–] Silentiea@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I mean we got Alex Jones for saying their parents were actors? Progress?

Until he's living in a van down by the river and eating whatever he scrapes off I-35, I'm not willing to say that we've "got him".

[–] smeenz@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

He hasn't had to pay anything yet, has he ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CatsGoMOW@lemmy.world 77 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Wow, had no idea it’s been that long already! 🤯

[–] rickyrigatoni@lemm.ee 38 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Probably because Alex Jones's court case about it was so recent.

[–] frunch@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

The gears of justice move slowly (or some similar line of dismissive bullshit)

[–] warm@kbin.earth 9 points 2 months ago

Man, I was like why are 12 year olds voting?

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 65 points 2 months ago (17 children)

This is my unsurprised face as 40%+ of them continue to vote republican, just like their parents always have.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I wonder which way many of these new voters lean. Willing to bet on the general direction of the group as a whole. There's always outliers, but I'm pretty confident on this one.

[–] BaldManGoomba@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago

I remember a story from one of schools that got shot up. There was always one that got highlighted in right wing news. They were going to be the Kyle Rittenhouse spokes like person but I think they couldn't stand being ridiculed by everyone

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 13 points 2 months ago

I know a guy who was a student there when it happened. Newtown is white-bread upper-middle Connecticut. Fairly conservative, in the actual sense, not the Republican sense. They've been fairly evenly split in the past few presidential elections. While some of the people directly affected might lean more left, I'm not sure if it's a significant number.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 8 points 2 months ago (3 children)
[–] HWK_290@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

The big yellow one is the sun!

[–] cranakis@reddthat.com 3 points 2 months ago

Hang in there. Don't forget your meds.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›