Didn't John McCain famously save it by breaking off to vote with Dems against Trumps wishes?
this post was submitted on 02 Oct 2024
537 points (99.4% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2386 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Yup. Plus Trump tried to repeal it on day one through executive order because he doesn't know how anything works.
Walz pointed out both of these last night.
Trump was just stress-testing it, see, he helped!
/s
Yes, but shortly after he cast his vote to end the individual mandate, causing less people to be insured and costs to rise.
Yeah. And then MAGA threatened to kill him for it afterwards. Totally normal people that lot
Yup. Right before his passing a few months later.
Yeah. Tim Walz mentioned that in the debate.
"in contradiction of history" is just a fancy way of saying that he lied. Call him a fucking liar like he is.
Journalistically, I think "lying" implies willfullness, and a reporter cannot 100% prove that a false statement was made willfully, with knowledge that the statement was false.
What the reporter can do is point out that the statement was false, with evidence that demonstrates that, even including statements to the contrary by the person making the false statement before and after. But you can't know for sure in the moment a false statement is being made that the person believed it was false as they were making it.
This journalistic concept is part of the reason the couch fucker meme took off. AP (was it AP?) published a story about how "No, JD Vance did not have sex with a couch," and then retracted it. Why? Because while there's no evidence that JD Vance did have sex with a couch, and there's plenty of evidence that JD Vance having sex with a couch was just a joke, there isn't any proof that JD Vance didn't have sex with a couch.
And yet Fox News will run a dozen stories on how Walz "lied" about his time in China.
That was bizarre and I have no idea what it was truly about. Seemed personal. On the other hand, just the other week Vance told some lies and brought terrorism to a community because of it. Which one is more important?
Walz was in China around the time of the Tiananmen Square protests but not at the time of the actual massacre.
Lol, you think Fox "News" is actually news? They've successfully argued in court that they're an entertainment company, so anyone who thinks their name means they have anything more than a tenuous connection to the truth is either dumb as fuck or just not paying any attention.
So the core Faux Lies viewer base.
It was interesting, but not surprising, that he said both that Obamacare was a failure, and that they would protect all the parts of it that people enjoy.
I liked "we don't need Obamacare because we have legislation protecting people with preexisting conditions"
Yeah, that would be Obamacare.
Obamacare and the ACA is just the Hannah Montana of Republican healthcare policy. They are running on getting rid of the singer but promising to keep the Miley around. I’m high so I’ll stop now
...what you do high they do stone sober. With a lawyer in the room to make sure they are on solid ground.
Have you looked at Trump’s lawyers?
I promise you they wouldn’t know solid ground if it suddenly disappeared from below them.
True. But remember Rush Limbaugh and 'inner city rap fans' as code for 'inner city rap fans?'
I like the way your stoned ass thinks lol
I know, I chortled at that during the debate. I wanted Walz to jump in that moment and say exactly that.
There was a moment where Vance was hammering the word "choice" about like daycare costs or something and I really wanted Walz to say "so NOW you care about choice?"
Trump and the GOP are directly responsible for killing the part of ACA that required people to have insurance in 2017. That is what allowed all the young healthy people to drop their insurance which caused costs to go up for everyone else. It de-socialized it.
Source: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tax_Cuts_and_Jobs_Act
That's sort of true, sort of not. The insurance companies were foaming at the mouth for this. It means they are unchecked in their march towards profit.
This was going to raise the price of medical care regardless of whether healthy people were in it or not. We have an aging, fat, sick society and they require very expensive care.
We have an aging, fat, sick society and they require very expensive care.
This is the exact reason why the mandate existed. Having all the young and healthy people paying into the insurance as well offsets the costs. That being said it would have been far better to have a public insurance run by the government that wasn't beholden to profit. AKA M4A
We can send billions to Israel to start WW3 with. But we can’t give health care to our own population.
God I hate this country. Especially the leadership
I'm 100% for universal health, single payer, or whatever gets health insurance companies out of the game.
But even if healthy people were forced into the system the ACA still makes private insurance unaffordable for regular people. If you don't have an employee who's sponsoring it, you're fucked.
load more comments
(8 replies)
Obama was right. Once people lived with the ACA, they wouldn’t want to go back. The GOP knows that now, so now they’re going to pretend that they fixed it.
All Donnie had to do was get his Congress to vote in some meaningless changes, and then proclaim that he'd 'fixed Obamacare' and take a victory lap. Put TrumpCare on the site and tell his MAGoos to sign up.
tbf, them taking responsibility for other people's accomplishments has gotten fairly common in recent years. They need to be able to show something to their voters asides tax cuts for the rich, half-built walls and bans of Muslims entering the country that get struck down in court. So why not steal credit for other people's successes?
Btw, did you all know that I'm actually the lead dev of Mastadon? Yep, it was just some barely-running service before I came along, and I got it fixed right up. Look at how good my project is doing! I'm just the greatest, aren't I?
Doesn’t everyone on both sides already know this? Is journalism just stating the obvious now? Is this how we are going to be fed from now on?
Man. That’s sad.
When one side of the political spectrum continually lies about literally everything, stating the obvious has basically become the job of journalists.
The problem isn't that they lie about everything well not the big problem. The real problem is the cultists believe the lies. We have the truths on video and they will choose to be duped.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(4 replies)
No. People who watch Fox News exclusively don’t know this. It’s the problem with that channel in particular.
Failure = success!
War is peace.
Freedom is slavery.
Ignorance is strength.
Don't they have a concept of a plan? Rolls eyes
Just Doubledown Vance
That plan has been 2 weeks away for a fucking decade.
view more: next ›