this post was submitted on 21 Nov 2024
726 points (99.7% liked)

Technology

59577 readers
4378 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Auli@lemmy.ca 106 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Ehh just fight it for a month pay king trump some money and bam their golden.

[–] Mog_fanatic@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago (5 children)

This is exactly what will happen. Same thing with Albertsons and Kroger too.

load more comments (5 replies)

Google ditched their "don't be evil" motto, so yeah, this is on the table.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 28 points 1 day ago (4 children)

sell it to Microsoft so they can finally have a web browser that people use

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SkybreakerEngineer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Microsoft run Chrome clone? But they already have Edge

[–] WhyFlip@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Which no one willingly uses

[–] jetsetdorito@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

it was good at launch, but they've added so much bloat

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] kibiz0r@midwest.social 35 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

People wondering what Chrome has to do with a search monopoly:

The obvious benefit is that they can default the user's search provider to Google.

But the more nefarious benefit is that, by controlling both the client and server, they can unilaterally decide the future of web standards. They don't have to advocate for proposals, gain consensus, and limit themselves to well-supported standards the way other companies do. They can just do it, gain the first-mover advantage, and force others to follow suit.

If they don't like HTTP/2, they can invent their own protocol and implement it for their search servers and Chrome. Suddenly, using Chrome with Google Search is way faster than using Chrome with Bing or using Firefox with Google Search. Even if Microsoft and Mozilla don't like the protocol, they now have to adopt it or fall behind.

This has happened. QUIC was deployed in 2012. Firefox gained support in 2021.

They're doing the same thing with Privacy Sandbox, and you can also look at browser feature compatibility tables to see how eager Google is to force their own interpretation of every not-yet-finalized web standard as the canonical interpretation.

Edit: Also, JPEG XL vs. WebP.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

Just...please for the love of whatever diety do Microsoft. Fucking sick of their shit recently with One Drive.

[–] rettetdemdativ@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

What changed with OneDrive? I'm genuinely interested because I'm a user and haven't noticed anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do you have a few minutes to learn about our lord and savior Linux?

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Man the Linux propaganda is STRONG on Lemmy. I'll say what I've said before: I use my computer for gaming, web browsing, and managing a media server for my family that hosts pictures and other things. If those 3 things can be done easily without issue on a Linux distro without having to fuck around with configs every time I want to do something, I'm all in. By what I've heard though it's just not there yet. I am super happy Steam decided to go Linux for their Steamdeck though as I've heard thats helped make monumental strides the right direction. Trust me, I want to. Large part of it is I worked tech support for over a decade and having to troubleshoot my own shit is like the furthest thing I want to deal with haha

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just going to say, I do those things too, on Linux, and while I can't say I never have to mess with config files, it's not frequent. And, the computer acting like it's my computer rather than on loan from a megacorp is nice.

It's not all the way there yet but it's so very close and the bits that are still pain points aren't nearly as bad as the pain points of Windows.

As the other commenter said, you should give it a serious try. Mint is very smooth overall.

[–] Bosht@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Appreciate it! Thank you!

[–] Alk@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Hey I will give my anecdotal recent experience. Several months ago I switched to Pop! OS and have had basically no issues. I have an Nvidia GPU and I play a lot of games. I don't play any games that are blocked by anti cheat (not because I can't, I just don't happen to play the few that are blocked).

I spent the first day getting everything signed in, installed, set up and tweaked to how I like it with very minimal terminal usage. Mostly gui and clicking.

Steam+Proton along with lutris makes it easy to play any game for me.

Side note: I have 4 monitors of varying resolution, size, orientation and refresh rate and it hasn't caused problems other than the initial setup (I used cursr to help with this)

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 200ok@lemmy.world 65 points 2 days ago (3 children)

If they're allowed to choose who they sell it to this won't change anything

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 51 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I think they should sell it to me.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] disconnectikacio@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

They should force google to kick sundar, the harmful thing, what made all google software, and services shit since it is the ceo...

load more comments (3 replies)

Step 1: Buy Chome

Step 2: End development

Step 3: ???

Step 4: ~~Profit?~~ Non-Profit Firefox?

[–] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 35 points 2 days ago (7 children)

They should force it to become a worker cooperative. It's the only solution that doesn't allow for corruption

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] xylogx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Who would buy this and how would they monetize it? In browser ads? A freemium paid model to remove the ads?

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 27 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'll bid $3.50 just to GPL it.

[–] theterrasque@infosec.pub 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] fool@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sure, but GPL would prevent the Chrome tracking addons and other pleasant closed-source paraphernalia (the difference between Chrome and Chromium)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 18 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Hot take: they sell Chrome but keep Chromium.

[–] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 22 points 1 day ago

Seeing how tech illiterate some of these people are, I wouldn’t be surprised if that’s what ends up happening

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›