1214
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] DaddleDew@lemmy.world 16 points 5 months ago

But just because it is in the EULA doesn't make it legal. At a time where big tech is being kept under a microscope for antitrust regulation, I'd say that an OS that actively destroys other competing OSes on the machine it is installed on should be considered an unfair anti-competitor tactic.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world -5 points 5 months ago

Idk why you think they have to support this. It'd be one thing if it was malicious but I really doubt it is.

[-] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 5 months ago

Might not hold up legally, but it's still insane that the single largest vendor of operating systems cant figure out how to install a bootloader with playing russian roulette.

[-] Mango@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

It's malicious.

this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2024
1214 points (97.4% liked)

linuxmemes

20753 readers
1470 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS