46
submitted 11 months ago by JWayn596@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Xariphon@kbin.social 14 points 11 months ago

Solidarity with the oppressor is a strange stance to take.

[-] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

He's doing it for his country, it's realpolitik.

[-] shalafi@lemmy.world 13 points 11 months ago

realpolitik

My god. It seems no one understands the word. ("Political capital" is another one people miss.)

Ukraine needs Western support and arms -> Israel gets Western support and arms -> you see where I'm going with this.

Zelensky would be a fool to do anything differently. His personal opinions, nor ours, have no play here.

[-] Chariotwheel@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah. realistically Isreal could offer Ukraine a lot more in help than Palestine. The sad reality, gotta kneel before the rich and kinda ignore what they do the poor if you want something. And Zelensky certainly wants some things.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Guess Iran shouldn't have gotten itself involved on Russia's side of the Ukraine war.

[-] atetulo@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

The fuck do they need to 'show' solidarity for? Just say you stand with Israel and move on.

All the money spent coordinating that visit could be better spent fighting the war in Ukraine.

[-] OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca 23 points 11 months ago

Political play, Israel hasn't went all in on Ukraine. This could be part of an agreement for weapon share, experience share, intel share, etc etc. Diplomacy is a fucked up thing.

[-] atetulo@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago

That's actually interesting. It could be beneficial if it resulted in greater support for Ukraine from Israel.

I'm mostly focusing on Israel supporting Ukraine because Ukraine has far fewer resources and a way greater enemy to face.

[-] OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 months ago

I mean Zelensky internationally is very popular. It draws attention, Currys sympathy and overall legitimizes the war declaration more. On top of thar the most experiences soldiers in the world are Ukrainians and or Russians at the moment. The Russians have been siding with Iran, so Israel probably a tad pissed. If Ukraine sends 10 instructors maybe Israel sends 10 AA missle launchers with rounds to Ukraine.

[-] HidingCat@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Isreal soldiers have been doing a fair amount of fighting over the years too, including the last decade. Maybe each soldier on average isn't the hardened vet the average Ukranian soldier is now, but the amount of instituional knowledge IDF has is not to be sneered at.

It definitely is a political play, like you said. More support from Israel for Ukraine, and maybe less support to Russia. I believe Israel is maintaining some nominal relation to Russia due to their histories.

[-] OttoVonNoob@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

Oh for sure don't get me wrong Israelis defiantly are top notch fighters and have experience. That being said the last full scale war they had against the Arab league didn't have drones. Which Ukraine and Russia are tbe only two armies getting real practice and experience.

[-] IonAddis@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

All the money spent coordinating that visit could be better spent fighting the war in Ukraine.

...you do realize that the ONLY reason the money coming in to Ukraine at the pace it is is because he said exactly the right things on the world stage at the right time in such a charismatic way that people believed in him enough that fundraising basically started flowing in?

His diplomatic/networking/fundraising acumen is WHY the money is flowing in, ya doofus.

Why the hell wouldn't he be furiously trying to arrange in-person meetings where he can use his personal social skills to forge diplomatic ties?

[-] atetulo@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago

So, you're saying that him going to visit Israel in person will result in more aid to Ukraine, enough to outweigh the costs of facilitating such a visit?

You could be right. You could be wrong. I guess we'll have to wait and see.

I think that Ukraine would receive the same amount of aid regardless of if Zelensky goes to Israel in person.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

Talk is cheap. Action isn’t.

[-] atetulo@lemm.ee 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What is the action?

Going there in person? How does that change things?

Heck, they could just send the money they would spend coordinating the visit to Israel to have a greater impact. But they have their own war to fight, so.

[-] QuarterSwede@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

It shows sincerity. This is how humans have made peace treaties and showed their real support for millennia.

[-] Zellith@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

Well dont forget; Ukraine is led by Nazis. How do you think Putin would try and twist this information?

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 0 points 11 months ago

What a shitty article to paint this as a fully cynical political action. Outside of Isreal and Ukraine facing the same enemy its important to remember that the vast majority of jews in the USSR were in the Ukrainian SSR and now have ties to modern day Ukraine. It'd be nice for Axios to at least mention that there is a cultural link between Isreal and Ukraine.

[-] ruford1976@lemmy.world -1 points 11 months ago

but then no one will click at their articles.

[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works -5 points 11 months ago

the vast majority of jews in the USSR were in the Ukrainian SSR and now have ties to modern day Ukraine.

I wonder how that happened 🤔

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 5 points 11 months ago

You think there were a lot of Jews in Ukraine because there were anti-Semitic nationalists in Ukraine?

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nope those were the reason there were so few Jews left in Ukraine. Still the most of all the USSR's republics, though. Not entirely surprising Ukraine has been habitually multiethnic since pretty much forever and it's not exactly far from Jerusalem.

[-] xmunk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

It's also important to remember that Ukraine was an incredibly good area to farm, had easy trade connections and was outside the control of catholic nations - so it was an attractive destination for refugees of all kinds.... that changed drastically when Tsarist Russia forced conformity (aka effectively a genocide) in the 1860s but before that point that area looked quite ethnicly diverse with an especially large Kazakh population.

this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
46 points (80.3% liked)

World News

38563 readers
2651 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS