this post was submitted on 16 Jun 2023
14 points (100.0% liked)

FREEMEDIAHECKYEAH

13 readers
1 users here now

๐Ÿฟ ๐Ÿ“บ ๐ŸŽต ๐ŸŽฎ ๐Ÿ“— ๐Ÿ“ฑ


๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ Wiki / ๐Ÿ’ฌ Chat


Rules

1. Please be kind and helpful to one another.

2. No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, spam.

3. Linking to piracy sites is fine, but please keep links directly to pirated content in DMs.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Following the announcement by beehaw admins to defederate from lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, there has been many posts and messages regarding that decisions and what other instances will do.

I personally believe Lemmy/kbin can only thrive if there is a free flow of content between different instances, with instance admins taking a back seat and focusing more on the infrastructure and making sure the technical bugs are smoothened out. Community mods can moderate their communities, and users can block the communities they don't find appealing (there's even a toggle in settings to hide every NSFW post from your feed altogether).

We don't want to create walled gardens, nor do we want to make Lemmy more confusing than it already is for new users. We will not be defederating from any instance if there is even one good community on it that our instance users might find useful. So far we have only blocked lemmygrad.ml, and right now we have no plans to block anyone else.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Rottcodd@lemmy.one 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just want to be able to control what I see. I have no desire to control what other people see and I sure as fuck don't want other people to control what I see.

That's it. That's my entire position on the matter.

[โ€“] JasSmith@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

I am dismayed with how many people want to control what others can see.

[โ€“] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Beehaw defederated because of users, not communities though. They wanted to control who could comment, not what people could see.

[โ€“] Rottcodd@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Their intent is irrelevant to my point.

[โ€“] Joker@lemmy.fmhy.ml 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I will say that I sometimes like to visit controversial communities due to curiosity, and to be amazed at all the insane and braindead things people say. Furthermore, I don't like living in a bubble, and knowing what people I disagree with say/think is important to forming well-informed opinions. So sometimes I do like to subscribe to communities on even places like lemmygrad just for those reasons. It's annoying when instances block controversial instances, because controversy often interesting and very lurkable. I understand why those places are blocked, and I definitely don't want to see fascist bs on my feed all the time. But I wish I could have the best of both worlds.

I wanna decide what I get to see. It would be cool if the instances could be blocked on a followers-only basis. Like, blocked for the all feeds, blocked in general. But not for me if I follow it.

I actually chose this instance in large part because it only blocks one other one lol

[โ€“] Tb0n3@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Are we not capable of hiding things we don't want to see on Lemmy ourselves? Why would I want to be babysat by anyone when I can make adult choices on what I want to see my own damn self? Censorship was what ruined Reddit years ago. Leave it entirely up to the users.

[โ€“] tehmics@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I'll echo this sentiment. I also lurk communities that I don't agree with, and I want to see dissenting views. I find that heavy moderation often just leads to echo chambers where real issues can be kicked under the rug

[โ€“] Watcher@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (9 children)

In my point of view it's a kind of censorship. Just let the user himself decide what he wants to see.

load more comments (9 replies)
[โ€“] dart@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Just throwing my opinion in... Since we can block communities on our own, we don't really need someone to decide which to block for us. I mean, it's not my instance, so you can do whatever you want, and I actually might've decided to block lemmygrad.ml myself, but I'd still rather see the posts and make that determination myself.

[โ€“] amcjv12@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Completely agree with this. I can block anything I don't want to see, and I'd rather not have someone else decide that for me

[โ€“] MisterFrog@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Can you blanket block comments from other instances users?

I am not a fan of Beehaw's decision, but I can't a setting where you can actually do this.

Thx admin chief ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ‘

Nice to see admins with a level head

[โ€“] HonorableScythe@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I sort of agree, but I also know that as Lemmy becomes more popular, defederating will become necessary as trolls and hate groups open instances. It's a problem on Mastodon. A trans friend there posted about her experience bra shopping and a bunch of transphobes from other Mastodon servers came in to attack her, including an admin of one server who called her a slur and told her to stop reporting because they'd never remove anything hateful towards trans people.

On a centralized service like Reddit, hate subs can just be quarantined by the admins or removed wholesale. With a decentralized service, every instance will need to defederate those groups to keep them out. There's no way to bar them from making a new server.

[โ€“] zinklog@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think it's different with Lemmy since people make posts in communities and it's in the community moderator's power to remove problematic comments.

If an entire instance supports or encourages such behaviour though, then you're right and such instances should be defederated.

[โ€“] dreadgoat@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's important to choose your home wisely.

I have an account here on kbin.social, but I also wanted a dedicated lemmy account. I chose fmhy because it aligns with what I want: hearing every voice, for better or for worse. I considered beehaw due to their large gaming community, but I read about their philosophy and saw that they were trying to create more of a safe space for their users (suspicion recently confirmed). If someone wants a more positive experience without having to worry about trolling and harassment, beehaw would be the better choice. I am personally fine with treading through sludge to find hidden gems, so I made my own choice.

Bear in mind that defederation ~~isn't bidirectional. If beehaw decides to defederate fmhy, I don't care, I can still see gaming@beehaw and interact with users that live on instances still federated with my own. But the beehaw users are safe from from troll-friendly hosts, so everybody wins.~~ This isn't true, as pointed out by zinklog. It can still be worked around by having accounts in multiple places, but even with the eventual account migration feature, this makes it impossible for anyone to see everything in any one place. Maybe this can be fixed in the future, as the fediverse continues to develop?

To directly map it to the example of your friend, if she chose to live on an instance more like beehaw, she would still be able to interact with the federated community at large, but be better shielded. If someone tried to throw slurs at her from an instance with a lower standard, she wouldn't see it at all, and the person delivering the slurs likely wouldn't even realize it.

[โ€“] zinklog@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Correct me if I'm wrong but it's my understanding that defederation is in fact bidirectional. lemmy.world can't see new posts from beehaw after the announcement.

Comment based on this post

[โ€“] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I personally believe Lemmy/kbin can only thrive if there is a free flow of content between different instances

I personally disagree. There will be entirely private instances, there will be instances with highly restricted federation. There will be instances that federate with most and there will be instances that federate without restriction. That's the beauty of the model and that's why kbin and lemmy with thrive.

[โ€“] FermatsLastAccount@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So far we have only blocked lemmygrad.ml, and right now we have no plans to block anyone else.

Why is lemmygrad blocked, but not exploding heads?

[โ€“] mambabasa@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because lemmygrad is a tankie hellhole. They support all kinds of authoritarian nonsense.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] kilmister@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A little bit late to the party here. What is the reason why lemmygrad.ml is blocked?

[โ€“] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Very tanky ultra left pro Russia, pro China, anti everyone else part of Fediverse.

Check them out if you like but they only talk shit about the West and NATO. Put another way, you are not missing much by avoiding them.

Thanks for that. I tried to subscribe to some German communities on Feddit just to find out that they blocked our instance on their end. Fuck them I guess, I'm staying here.

[โ€“] tartarsauce@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I very much appreciate this philosophy. It looks like this is the right instance for me :)

[โ€“] knife@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

thank you for not being a drama queen and railroading this whole thing by leveraging the small amount of power you have to make some bullshit point about your social views.

[โ€“] Angleslam@lemmy.fmhy.ml 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why did lemmygrad get blocked?

[โ€“] AtomicAria@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (11 children)

It's full of tankies (fascists who like the color red).

Does that mean exploding heads will get defederated?

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next โ€บ