[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I would just argue that objects of the Person-type are mutable, because basically everything about them can change without modifying who they are. The only thing immutable about a person is any one Moment-type object in their past.

Edit: I found your comment to be an interesting take on the concept, thank you!

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 6 points 3 days ago

Wait wait wait... immutable means unchangeable! In your analogy this would mean if someone changes anything about them, like a name due to marriage or gender due to affirming care, they become a new object. And you can, but shouldn't assign that new object the same UUID.

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 7 points 6 days ago

Religion is such a great thing [...] you almost say [...] let's not be good what difference does it make

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 9 points 1 week ago

It's about options, buddy! Having a headphone jack does not prevent you from using Bluetooth headphones.

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

You won't get away from that with MD3

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago

The victims come in all shapes, sizes, and colours though.

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago

Mehr Taucher als Frauen hier, verrückt!

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 14 points 2 weeks ago

They might keep driving, but some infotainment features (or even other features that are tied to subscriptions) might stop working.

Depending on the implementation of these features that could mean the car constantly shows error messages, or the infotainment freezes, or in the worst case the car won't even start or charge.

Some of these concerns are true for newer cars of traditional manufacturers: what happens when their online services become unavailable?

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 3 points 2 weeks ago

Women are confidential or privileged information in [the area].

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago

Look at the panel in the lower right corner.

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 3 points 3 weeks ago

60% of lightspeed, according to another commenter.

[-] FleetingTit@feddit.org 1 points 3 weeks ago
  1. under screen fingerprint readers (USFR) have basically no accuracy problems? I find that mine rarely struggles to read my fingerprint, and the one on my Ipad (on the power button) sometimes doesn't register the first time either.

  2. the USFR DON'T need to scan all the time, they can just wake when YOU TOUCH THE SCREEN! It's basically the same for ALL kinds of fingerprint readers, so it's a non-issue.

  3. well, I concede that point

  4. cost comes down with scale. Also phones are ridiculously expensive nowadays, the cost of the sensor doesn't have a huge impact on that.

  5. fingerprint readers can scratch as easily as the screen. People are much more likely to make sure the screen does not get damaged than the finger print reader.

  6. traditional finger print readers struggle when wet as well. Also your phone is basically unusable anyways, when it's wet.

I mean it comes down to preference, but I like the scanner to be under the screen. All the things you listed really speak against finger print scanners in general, why not use Face ID?

view more: next ›

FleetingTit

joined 2 months ago