movies

1175 readers
142 users here now

A community about movies and cinema.

Related communities:

Rules

  1. Be civil
  2. No discrimination or prejudice of any kind
  3. Do not spam
  4. Stay on topic
  5. These rules will evolve as this community grows

No posts or comments will be removed without an explanation from mods.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
51
52
53
54
 
 

Well, I did it. Watched all of RoboCop 2 on VCD—on a CRT—outdoors, in my backyard.

Why? Not because it’s the “best” way to watch RoboCop 2. That would be a projector in a dark room. But I still own a Sony Trinitron and a Toshiba DVD player that’s backwards-compatible with VCDs. So when I found a copy in a thrift shop, I jumped at the chance to cosplay as a Tokyo salaryman in 1998.

VCD has always fascinated me. I remember seeing it demoed on a Philips CD-i—back when that was supposed to be the future. But I was a teenager, and there was no way I could convince my parents to spend $600 on something that looked like a toaster and played Burn:Cycle.

Probably for the best. The CD-i flopped in North America, and VCD barely made a dent. But in Asia? Massive success. So successful, you can still import brand-new titles. In 2025. For real.

Now let me be clear: on modern TVs, VCD looks awful. Low-res MPEG-1 video smeared across a 1080p screen is pain. But on a CRT? It works. You get sharper colour separation, no tape degradation, no tracking issues, and discs are far more heat- and humidity-resistant than tape ever was. I totally get why this format won out in hot climates.

That said, it has real flaws. Most movies come on two discs. You can see pixels—even on a CRT. And occasionally, compression artifacts float across the screen like ghosting shadows. VHS was blurrier, yes—but it was also more forgiving.

Still, let’s be honest: rewinding tapes was always a chore. VCD boots instantly. No hiss. No jammed reels. No chewed-up tape. Just press play.

So how was RoboCop 2 on VCD? Surprisingly great. The movie itself feels built for this exact experience: digital source, analog display. Grainy, loud, kind of ugly—but in a good way. Total time capsule energy.

Should you collect VCDs in 2025? Only if you’re like me and romanticize obsolete tech. If you hate pixels, compression artifacts, and pre-DVD formats, then no—run away. But if the idea of watching cyberpunk trash on a 4:3 CRT in your backyard sounds fun? Then yeah. Absolutely.

55
 
 

Cross-posted from "what do you think he was thinking?" by @classybattery@sh.itjust.works in !nostupidquestions@lemmy.world


this is a fun question, i guess. i don’t want to appear stupid, i’m just really autistic.

https://youtu.be/kvkJZxzv-TA

in one of the scenes, the dark-haired antagonist tells the older vicar to tell him how to kill the were-rabbit, but he slips up and says “him”

SPOILERto show that he knows it’s wallace

when the antagonist catches himself and says he meant “it”, the vicar raises an eyebrow at him. I don’t mean to appear stupid, i just have no one to talk about random stuff like this with and want other perspectives on character body language :]

56
57
 
 

A quick 7-minute short film I found enjoyable about loneliness. Surprised to find a copy online still.

58
 
 

Judge Dredd (1995) - "Less Yapping" addition

This movie had incredible set pieces and costumes. The script and acting didn't meet that standard. The idea here is to make the movie watchable by removing the weakest parts.

Changes:

  • There is an annoying comic relief character. Their total dialogue has been reduced by about 80%. This is the main feature of this edit.
  • The seniour judges sometimes had drawn out, pompous dialogue. That's been reduced.
  • Rico's more over the top moments have beed dialled down a little.
  • Cheesiest dialogue has been removed.

Notes: The priority here was to make an enjoyable edit without too much hard work. Some parts don't have the cleanest edits, but were kept because an imperfect edit was better than the material removed by the edit.

Original Running time: 96 minutes Fan Edit Running time: 88 minutes

Original Release Year: 1995 Fan Edit Release Year: 2025

Editor: Sébastien T

59
 
 

Summary
Superman (David Corenswet) returns as a fully formed hero, dropping into an international crisis where his actions—like stopping a dangerous global conflict—spark both admiration and controversy. As he confronts Lex Luthor’s schemes and defends democratic values, Lois Lane (Rachel Brosnahan) investigates deeper political tensions. The film also features cameos from Guy Gardner (Nathan Fillion), Hawkgirl (Isabela Merced), Mister Terrific (Edi Gathegi), and Metamorpho (Anthony Carrigan), all leading up to a broader DC Universe introduction.

Director
James Gunn

Writer
James Gunn

Cast

  • David Corenswet as Clark Kent / Superman
  • Rachel Brosnahan as Lois Lane
  • Nicholas Hoult as Lex Luthor
  • Nathan Fillion as Guy Gardner / Green Lantern
  • Isabela Merced as Kendra Saunders / Hawkgirl
  • Edi Gathegi as Michael Holt / Mister Terrific
  • Anthony Carrigan as Rex Mason / Metamorpho
  • Skyler Gisondo as Jimmy Olsen
  • Sara Sampaio as Eve Teschmacher
  • María Gabriela de Faría as Angela Spica / The Engineer
  • Wendell Pierce as Perry White
  • Alan Tudyk, Pruitt Taylor Vince, Neva Howell, and others in supporting roles

Rotten Tomatoes: 83%

Metacritic: 68

VOD: Theaters

60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
 
 

Thoughts?

view more: ‹ prev next ›