this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
165 points (96.1% liked)

Technology

59270 readers
3649 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 109 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Your daily reminder that by paying for streaming services, you're receiving a worse product than the alternative.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I refuse to pay for any streaming services. I am in the 1% of consumers taking a stand, and have had zero impact in the trajectory of video streaming the entire god damn time.

[–] ProfessorProteus@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

There are dozens of us!

[–] ScreamingFirehawk@feddit.uk 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

What is the alternative? Piracy?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 3 months ago

buying physical media

[–] Rai@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 3 months ago
[–] Rade0nfighter@lemmy.world 53 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Content advertising isn’t “on brand” for Apple, so this would be a bold move.

[–] Frog@lemmy.ca 34 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think we passed that point after the ads in the App Store,News app, Books app, and Music app.

[–] Rade0nfighter@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Agree they’ve being easing their way in for a while. My point was specifically about advertising within the content itself which would be a new line crossed.

Edit: actually yes they did do this with Apple News didn’t they! (Which is why I stopped paying for it).

[–] darkevilmac@lemmy.zip 27 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Advertising in general has been a growing revenue stream for Apple from my understanding. That "anti-tracking" they added a few iOS versions back also conveniently increased Apple's ad revenue because other advertisers didn't get the same data that Apple would just have by default.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago

I've lost count of the volume of times I've been downvoted for stating that Apples transition to a services based company guaranteed they would become the enemy of every users privacy, regardless of all their virtue signaling about privacy.

Meanwhile, in the 2020's you can not longer do offline dictation at all, on a several thousand dollar machine, without agreeing to sending PII and transcripts of all your dictations to Apple servers... You could do completely offline dictation a decade ago, on a machine that was about 1/10th as powerful.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 23 points 3 months ago

You know what is on brand for Apple? Making tons of money.

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 44 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Oh no! I hope this doesn't affect my pirated copies.

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml 41 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can't wait for the advertisers to start dictating the content of the programming to help sell ads. Because that's coming next. Let's totally wipe the premium sheen off premium streaming TV.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Thats always been there because the ads are baked in the shows too.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 3 months ago (1 children)

step 1: position yourself has high quality, low cost compared to the others

step 2: win awards for programming furthering the high quality of your service

step 3: raise prices

step 4: cancel the shows people raved about

step 5: bring in ads

step 6: ???

[–] rustyricotta@lemmy.ml 20 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Everyone's reading from the same playbook

[–] eletes@sh.itjust.works 10 points 3 months ago

It's probably a McKinsey playbook getting passed around

[–] maegul@lemmy.ml 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

While there's a bit of a focus here on what it'd "mean" for Apple to do this ... more broadly, which streaming services don't have ads by now? Prime and Netflix do, I know that much.

Basically it seems the industry has done exactly what cable did IIRC ... once they've got you by the balls they'll squeeze you as dry as they can.

Apart from finding a local hardcopy rental shop (I have and am trying to use it as much as possible), or you know, just not watching, "reverting" back to piracy is likely the only way to react here.

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The problem is mathematics.

Capitalism requires that profits always increase, but we live on a finite planet, with a finite amount of land, a finite amount of resources, and a finite number of humans... always, eventually, the ONLY option to continue this dichotomy is to squeeze your existing customer base, and extract as much value from them as possible (by devaluing your product). Unfortunately customers do not hold unlimited value, so the house of cards will collapse one way or the other.

Clearly, the only solution is to wage a war on mathematics.

[–] CaptainSpaceman@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Thats never the ONLY option, its just that the biggest winners in capitalism also make the rules, so they choose to always be the winners

There are other options of course, but those require the proles choosing something besides escapism.

[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago
[–] thoralf@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 3 months ago

I only see Apple TV+ as a bonus to the Premium subscription. But if they really fuck it up like this, I will unbundle my subscription and cancel Apple TV+.

Fuck ads!