133
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 22 points 1 week ago

I'm worried about the direction of Mozilla, though. We need another :'(

[-] thebigslime@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

LibreWolf for desktop, Mull for Android.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 9 points 1 week ago

Aren't those Firefox with some patches?

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

Well yes, but it's the patches that make them special. Every Firefox fork that disables Mozilla PPA by default is another browser that cuts into Mozilla's attempt to resell private data to advertisers while marketing it as private (which is, I kid you not, a reason they say they needed it enabled by default).

And considering Firefox itself is still open source, it's a completely valid browser to base a fork off of. Especially when the only serviceable alternative is Chrome right now.

[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 1 points 1 week ago

Isn't chromium open source too?

someone else can probably give a more comprehensive/correct answer but here is how I understand it. i believe chromium is open source and chrome is mostly chromium but also some proprietary (and therefor unknown) bits are included. whereas firefox is entirely open source, meaning you could compile it yourself and still end up with the same package.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
this post was submitted on 04 Oct 2024
133 points (94.0% liked)

Firefox

17751 readers
565 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS