this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2024
180 points (99.5% liked)

World News

39032 readers
2115 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Eight of the country’s 11 supreme court judges will stand down over reforms supported by President Claudia Sheinbaum

Eight of Mexico's 11 supreme court judges have submitted their resignations after controversial judicial reforms, the top court has said.

In a move that has sparked diplomatic tensions and opposition street protests, Mexico is set to become the world's only country to allow voters to choose all judges, at every level, starting next year.

The eight justices -- including president Norma Pina -- declined to stand for election in June 2025, a statement said, adding that one of the resignations would take effect in November and the rest next August.

The announcement came as the supreme court prepares to consider a proposal to invalidate the election of judges and magistrates. President Claudia Sheinbaum, however, has said that the court lacks the authority to reverse a constitutional reform approved by congress.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] andrewta@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago (43 children)

What would be a real world problem on voting for those judges?

[–] Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win 71 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

It biases them towards catering to public demand instead of being a neutral arbiter of justice.

Want to keep your job as judge? Better not be 'weak on crime' etc...

[–] rah@feddit.uk 38 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (2 children)

It biases them towards catering to public demand instead of being a neutral arbiter of justice.

But they're biased anyway, towards whoever has the power to take away their job. They're never neutral arbiters of justice.

[–] TomSelleck@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

Especially in rural areas where they can just legislate criminal justice policy from the bench.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (40 replies)