this post was submitted on 12 Aug 2023
258 points (97.1% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3781 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Forkk@forkk.me 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Disabling JavaScript seems to work in most cases. Not sure why that isn't listed higher up on here

[–] OldFartPhil@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That’s my go-to technique. But I would prefer that Lifehacker was not publicizing it.

[–] Forkk@forkk.me 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure most are already aware of it, but to get around it they'd have to lock part of the article behind a "load more" button that requires JS (or even just auto-load it via JS without a button), which I have seen some do.

There must be a reason it's not done universally though. Maybe because it'd break archives? Not sure

[–] meismyname@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

My assumption is that they want the content to load initially so search engines can index it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)