this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
749 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3357 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jenniebuckley@lemmy.world 75 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

fuck YouTube premium. why would I pay £19.99 a month when literally the only defining feature for me is no ads. all this will do is allow for more complex ad blockers to be made to bypass this

[–] Z4rK@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (12 children)

The creators also get a good chunk of the money from premium as far as I’ve been able to verify (by asking some I follow directly).

[–] Hardeehar@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (11 children)

Why not pay creators directly through Patreon PayPal or equivalent instead of Google as well?

[–] mjs@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

If no one pays for YouTube how can they keep supporting their insanely costly infrastructure? Hosting all those videos is not free. Far from it.

I'm perfectly fine paying for YouTube if that means I can continue to have access to awesome creators under a easy to use platform. It would be a very sad day if Google decided to shut down YouTube due to not being able to cover it's costs.

The only other company that could potentially take over would be meta. Which would probably be even worse. At least YouTube provides an option to pay to disable ads.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 8 points 1 year ago

Good. Let them close it.

They won't, because it's still making money hand over fist. This is all because tech profits are down a smidge now we're all getting back to normal after COVID, so they're all cranking up the enshittification dial to compensate.

None of these companies are "losing" money. They're just making very slightly less than they were before. Fuck 'em.

[–] Hardeehar@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I would be fine if YouTube crumbled and was put into second place by a better platform or two.

Yes it's the best option currently which is why they can do such ridiculous practices.

But once they have actual competition, I expect them to bend over backwards for my attention. Because if they don't change the current trajectory, they'll go the way of the other digital giants of the past.

Do not worry about having a viable platform in a future without YouTube. I am 100% sure there will be one.

I just wish they kept the ads at the start and end. There is something off putting about watching some documentary about some horrible event only to have it pause for some perky Grammarly ad in the middle of it.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

This is an extremely unlikely hypothetical. Google is one of the most profitable companies in the world and there is no sign of that changing, even considering all the people who block ads right now. There is no reason to squeeze everyone like this.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)