this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
58 points (95.3% liked)

Wikipedia

2156 readers
274 users here now

A place to share interesting articles from Wikipedia.

Rules:

Recommended:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (15 children)

Then everything for the future is purely hope. You eat a steak? I sure hope it doesn't turn into lava in your stomach! You enter a car? Better hope it doesn't turn into a crocodile and swallow you!

Must be a strange life you're leading, but anything you can tell yourself to ease your conscience. Surely the same number of cows would be killed if nobody ate any meat, they could always hope that tomorrow people start again!

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (10 children)

cows were killed before anybody bought meat. there is no reason to believe that will stop even if you stop buying it.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (9 children)

Are you a bad faith troll, or is this supposed to be a serious argument?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's sad, what an illogical approach to an ethical dilemma.

"Oh well, people died before laws were introduced, may as well go on a killing spree" - right? Nothing else matters?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

"Oh well, people died before laws were introduced, may as well go on a killing spree"

this is a strawman. my argument is more like "you may object to killing animals for food, but your method is not an effective way to stop it"

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Which is an incredibly stupid point, because it presupposes that reducing needless deaths only has value if absolutely every single death is prevented. This, of course, is completely illogical - even one death that was prevented has value.

But we don't care about silly things like "logic" here, right?

Not to mention that your original point was that you bear no responsibility for the deaths of animals you consume, but who cares as long as you can keep giving stupid arguments ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)
[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

What the fuck are you talking about? Your response has nothing to do with my point. Complete non-sequitur.

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

isn't your point that you think by abstaining from consuming meat, meat production will be impacted? the production grows incessantly. it's obvious that meat producers do not care whether you buy meat.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

I really, really hope you're a bad faith troll, because otherwise I'm scared for you. A person with your level of intelligence can't survive on their own. Do you have anyone taking care of you?

[–] nsrxn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 month ago

your original point was that you bear no responsibility for the deaths of animals you consume

right. and this speaks directly to that.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)