this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2025
33 points (77.0% liked)

science

15349 readers
197 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

<--- rules currently under construction, see current pinned post.

2024-11-11

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/24943429

Human ancestors like Australopithecus – which lived around 3.5 million years ago in southern Africa – ate very little to no meat, according to new research published in the scientific journal Science. This conclusion comes from an analysis of nitrogen isotope isotopes in the fossilized tooth enamel of seven Australopithecus individuals. The data revealed that these early hominins primarily relied on plant-based diets, with little to no evidence of meat consumption.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

It is not your fault you fail to understand, people have different abilities.

[–] HylicManoeuvre@sh.itjust.works -4 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Indeed. Mine include having a MSc. in Molecular Biology, yours, trolling on the internet

[–] seven_phone@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (6 children)

From your subject knowledge and comprehension you almost certainly do not have a postgraduate degree, I have a PhD in soft rock geology. I have explained to you twice that opportunistic means taking whatever is most readily available. Under the circumstances discussed that will be most often plant material but that selection does not imply any preference. You are the only one implying preference because you are trying to crowbar in your vegetarian agenda. I see also you have cranked up a few side accounts to upvote yourself.

[–] HylicManoeuvre@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I see also you have cranked up a few side accounts to upvote yourself.

lmao got me Mr. Soft Rock 🤡

I will just leave this without further comment, people reading your "contributions" can make up their own mind as to your credibility and whether or not it is I who has the agenda.

Edit: For people actually interested in the science, here's an interesting example of what opportunistic-carnivorous feeding would've looked like -- underscoring the absurdity of talking about meat-eating in terms of preference in an anthropological/survival context.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)