this post was submitted on 28 Feb 2025
583 points (95.2% liked)

Technology

63902 readers
5673 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
583
GitHub - LadybirdBrowser/ladybird: Truly independent web browser (github.com)
submitted 5 days ago by mesamunefire@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
188 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dumnonii@piefed.social 11 points 5 days ago (26 children)

I can't see anything about this on DuckDuckGo. Do you have a link?

[–] RayJW@sh.itjust.works 30 points 5 days ago (11 children)

https://mkultra.monster/tech/2024/07/03/serenityos-and-ladybird

This was a little „write-up“ back when everything became more public.

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 28 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (8 children)

I'm surprised this got any kind of attention.

Here's the turn of events from my perspective:

  1. Someone submits a 1-line PR changing the gender used in a code comment
  2. PR rejected on the grounds that the change is "politically motivated"
  3. Submitter got mad, and proposed removing the rule against "politically motivated" changes, calling it "white supremacist," which is closed
  4. Someone wrote a blog post about it

Here's my analysis:

  1. Stupid change - don't make PRs that simply correct an irrelevant typo in a comment somewhere; some people do this to put stuff on a resume (look at how much FOSS work I do!), and it just wastes everyone's time
  2. Stupid response - it should've been rejected because it's a useless change, not because it's "politically motivated"
  3. Stupid proposal - do you really want to waste a bunch of time fighting over wording in a comment? Because that's the kind of crap you get without a rule like this.
  4. This is all about an irrelevant change to a comment? Why is this getting so much attention?
[–] pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I should be an idiot. I dont see a direct relationship between race and sexual orientation. Even if the PR was rejected because a pronounce how the hell this is white supremacist?

[–] sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works 6 points 5 days ago

Well, didn't the Nazis also discriminate against gay people?

That said, it's a massive leap to go from "rejects 1 line PR that only changes gender in a comment" to literal Nazi...

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)