this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
3 points (80.0% liked)

Lemmy

12531 readers
24 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I think the way federation currently works spells doom for the fediverse, should any service of it get major traction. Currently, if you subscribe to a community on Lemmy or follow a user on Mastodon, your instance will pull the content of that instance/user and make it available for all to see and interact with. What seems like a good idea to spread content however is becomming the achilles heel of the fediverse: The admins of Lemmy/Mastodon instances are liable in many juristictions for the content their servers are distributing. This means in practice that many Lemmy/Mastodon instances block NSFW content for example, as the admins, understandably so, are either unwilling or incapable of making sure they are not running afoul of any laws.

As such, I think that the fediverse needs to offer a way for users to follow content from other instances without having that content be stored, let alone shared by their home instances.

A question I have at this point is where this criticism is best levied against. Is it the job of Lemmy/Mastodon to provide such a form of federation, or does the ActivityPub protocol needs to be ammended?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 year ago (13 children)

It's the job of the user. If your instance blocks content, move instances. It's that simple.

[–] suavelizard@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which doesn't work seamlessly. You have to create a new account and re-subscribe.

Lemmy needs to decouple accounts from instances so you have the freedom of movement.

[–] huskypenguin@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mastadon has the ability to copy your account data across instances, is that not the case here?

load more comments (11 replies)