:::spoiler spoiler
this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2025
594 points (96.3% liked)
Memes
48781 readers
1655 users here now
Rules:
- Be civil and nice.
- Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My mistake, I was going off memory and got the year mixed up with the year of Operation Ajax, the Iranian coup.
Yes, I supposed the fact that the CIA was sponsoring a group called "Hungarian Freedom Fighters" does not definitively prove that it was it was in any way connected to partisan activity in Hungary, the way that CIA funded groups were doing all over the globe at this time. Maybe it was pure coincidence!
What was this group? Do you have any info on when and where it was actually active and what were its intents? Do you know anything about this incorporated (???) organisation aside from its name and that it was supported by CIA in 1963?
This is not how any historical event can be meaningfully approached. You're not an oracle, intuitions and insinuations are not proof, please use actual data, show actual connections and explanations of the claims regarding the 1956 revolution.
Isn't it? If an organization exists that has the ability to cover up it's involvement in things like this reliably and very rarely leaves behind hard evidence, and I'm a rando trying to piece together what happened 70 years later, then it seems like circumstantial evidence is the best I could reasonably expect to find. This isn't a court of law where the standard is either, "100%, beyond any reasonable doubt, or they didn't do it."
This shows evidence of a connection - would it be enough to convict in a court of law? No. But, does it shape up to being more likely than not? Seems like it to me. Past precedent shows they could do it and get away with it, and we've got their fingerprints near it, so you can keep imagining that this Hungarian Freedom Fighters org connected to the CIA was, I don't know, selling dinner plates or something, but I'm gonna connect point A to point B myself.
antonim raised a good point, actually. While I wouldn't put it past the CIA to do something like this, the fact is that this vague document is hardly evidence of the CIA funding the Hungarian revolution. Besides, a historian would be far more qualified to look at archival material since they're actually trained to do that.