this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
562 points (98.6% liked)

World News

47442 readers
2615 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Mike Huckabee suggested any future Palestinian state should be carved out of ‘a Muslim country’

Mike Huckabee, the US ambassador to Israel, has said that the US is no longer pursuing the goal of an independent Palestinian state, marking what analysts describe as the most explicit abandonment yet of a cornerstone of US Middle East diplomacy.

Asked during an interview with Bloomberg News if a Palestinian state remains a goal of US policy, he replied: “I don’t think so.”

The former Arkansas governor chosen by Donald Trump as his envoy to Israel went further by suggesting that any future Palestinian entity could be carved out of “a Muslim country” rather than requiring Israel to cede territory.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (14 children)

Not superior, but different. And yes, tribes are different, of course they are. Completely sober, a group of Germans/Finns and a group of Nigerians/Venezuelans/Algerians are completely different and we both know how. Western Europeans without ideology and morality turn into murderers. History proves it. They have fewer issues in dehumanising others, they sleep well at night in a house they robbed from people they killed (from the Native Americans to the Palestinians). No bs, can you say the same for other people in earnest?

[–] deaf_fish@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago (9 children)

So you're saying it's a cultural issue. Would you agree then that if easterners were to get culture that would allow them to justify colonization and murder, they would do the same things as westerners?

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (8 children)

It's almost entirely cultural, of course, but I do think (I can't prove it, it's just travel and observation) that there are innate psychological differences to people of different tribes. The Congolese, the Austrian and the Nepali are different in a deeper way than nurture can account for, I think.

[–] deaf_fish@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Okay well if it's cultural then culture can be changed. So if you're an easterner, you need to be careful that you don't end up like westerners. The ideological plague that hit westerners can get easterners as well.

At the end there, It kind of seemed like you were heading back towards the race argument.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What if it accounted for a little bit, the tiniest bit, of our psychological makeup? Would it be so terrible or dangerous of an idea? Not for clear minds and kind hearts, surely. I mean, everyone can swim and everyone can run but you know who's gotta have at least the smallest of edges everything else being equal, right? That's easy to accept, maybe this is just the next frontier, that we're not just tabula rasa, but we have some innate tendencies towards/eases and difficulties regarding A or B the more we have of this or another tribe in us. It's not something I will "die on a hill" for, simply because my evidence is all anecdotal, but 🤷.

[–] deaf_fish@midwest.social 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Between person to person. Yeah that's fine. But comparing population to population is dangerous. Once you know, what do you do with that information?

Historically, this line of thinking has never worked out very well. And as time goes on, who cares, we'll all breed together anyway.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't take it personally that the further North I go, the more spaced out people are at bus stations and the further South I go, the louder people will talk, I guess.😅 But you're right, we aren't ready for it.

[–] deaf_fish@midwest.social 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, I don't take it personally and I would agree with you if you're asserting these differences are cultural. Unless you're saying this is genetic?

Edit: cultural or a result of societal pressure. I don't mean to imply that particular cultures are bad.

[–] ArgumentativeMonotheist@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

I was replying with the "what would you do with the information?" with that "I don't take personally etc etc"! 😅 As in, I won't take offence to 'weird' and seemingly antisocial behaviour, because I understand there's some differences in personality between tribes (meaning whatever they're giving me I need to reprocess accordingly). Perhaps, they have the tiniest bit of a genetic component (and are even harder/impossible to fully change, and hence why some of these differences and characteristics have been there seemingly forever). I mean, would that be that bad? Or does it really seem that far fetched?

[–] deaf_fish@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, sorry, I misunderstood.

I mean if it's a fun hobby of yours, go for it. But you know the history of this stuff as well as I do. It comes with a lot of baggage and people are not going to respond well to it. The group of people that will respond well to it, let's just say, I don't think you want to keep their company. Unless of course you are racist, in which case, you'd be fine.

Yep yep yep. A minor wrong turn and we're back at phrenology and 'genetic supremacy'...

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)