this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2025
71 points (97.3% liked)

Rust

7121 readers
4 users here now

Welcome to the Rust community! This is a place to discuss about the Rust programming language.

Wormhole

!performance@programming.dev

Credits

  • The icon is a modified version of the official rust logo (changing the colors to a gradient and black background)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 1 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

I don't see a problem. If someone forks it and changes the license to some proprietary, then their fork is proprietary. The original software is still Open Source. People act like as if the original license changed.

[–] 7dev7random7@suppo.fi 4 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

And it the fork gets adapted the user base doesn't use an open source project anymore. Changes which aren't synced get shipped and you can't substitute anymore.

Permissive licenses are bad: Someone can take your entire code, build upon it, get hand of the userbase and then make weird changes. They don't protect the users in any form.

Just imagine someone changed the tools you use daily in such a way that none of your workflows are executed in the same way prior.

You just learn this once you are truly affected. And trust me - This sucks hard.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 0 points 2 weeks ago (3 children)

Right, but the other fork became its own project. I have no problem with it. As long as the original code license is not changed.

[–] 7dev7random7@suppo.fi 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Good luck picking another license than GPL for this requirement.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)