this post was submitted on 26 Aug 2023
1646 points (97.4% liked)

> Greentext

7547 readers
22 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] anaesidemus@hexbear.net 8 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Generally competition is good

no

[–] ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)
[–] notceps@hexbear.net 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sure I'll bite, competition is incredibly hard to attain so hard in fact that it doesn't exist in the real world.

For one I'll say that when we talk about competition should have the following elements:

No competitor has a large market share (A large marketshare would help them influence prices which they can use to drive out other competitors taking their market share) Almost no barrier to enter and exit the competition Consumers have perfect information

Now ignoring that 'competitors' will activly try to destroy perfect competitions to go for higher profits why do even consumers not want competition? Economies of Scale

In order to have perfect competition you need an 'excess' of competitors. So think 100 furniture factories when 10 could do that work, every factory needs to figure out their own logistics, sale and management, this means that the state of competition is less efficient than a state that is closer to a monopoly/duopoly/oligopoly with several larger companies, even if those companies suck.

This is also of course ignoring natural monopolies aka utilities.

[–] ndondo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

Thank you I've gotten so many quality responses to this question and alot to think about.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)