319

About a million people aged below 50 die of cancer annually, a study says, projecting another 21 percent rise by 2030.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 year ago
[-] maegul@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago

I think the argument they're making is that detecting that a death is caused by cancer is probably not an advanced affair requiring new diagnostic technology.

Personally, I think it's an interesting question, given that it stands to reason that cancer, by the time it has caused death, should be pretty easily detectable in any sort of autopsy.

[-] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 8 points 1 year ago

A post-mortem is not what most people think of when talking about cancer diagnostics.

[-] lte678@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Well, the article refers to both :)

I think you'd be right about the "number of diagnoses" statement in the title, but I think the discussion is about the deaths due to cancer, which have also increased and would not have as strong of a correlation for the reasons others mentioned

[-] Illecors@lemmy.cafe 5 points 1 year ago

But that's directly related. People used to die when "catching a cold". We call that lung cancer nowadays. Same thing with many other branches of cancer.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
319 points (97.9% liked)

World News

32075 readers
840 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS