this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
301 points (99.0% liked)

World News

32316 readers
1238 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NotSpez@lemm.ee 54 points 1 year ago (17 children)

This title almost reads like The Onion.

On a serious note, why? These people (on both sides) have enough money saved, health benefits etc to comfortably retire. Why don’t they? Are they so bought and paid for that their ‘investors’ won’t let them?

[–] Kes@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

Seniority plays a major role in committee appointments. Sure, you could replace the senile 95 year old who doesn't know the cold war is over with a younger candidate, but that senile 95 year old has been in Congress for longer than the other guy has been alive, and he's on some important committees because of it that the younger candidate wouldn't be able to be in

load more comments (16 replies)