1994
submitted 1 year ago by Oiconomia@feddit.de to c/memes@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] BornVolcano@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I may be stupid.

But I have no idea how people are comparing "better" or "worse" cables. I always just assumed they were just cables.

Edit: for people downvoting me, I'm not saying they are just cables, I'm just saying I don't know what the difference is, and asking for an explanation. Please calm down.

[-] sebi@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is physical connections between devices. The pins that make electrical contact. There are 24 on UsbC and 8 on lightning making a lot more things possible.

Also there are structural benifits. Lightning connectors are held in by the device which makes replacing the clamp a lot more difficult than just switching the cable like UsbC, where that mechanism is inside the cable.

And last but not least is Usb an open protocol while you would have to pay Apple if you wanted to implement Lightning.

[-] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Though lightning had 8 pins, for being reversible it is actually 2 pairs of 4 pins.

USB-C works around this by using cc1/2 pin which indicates the orientation of the connection.

[-] sebi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I think the Lightning-Protocol was a little more difficult, because there were Display Adapters which probably need more than 4 lanes. And who could forget: some iPad actually had Usb 3 over Lightning.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2023
1994 points (95.8% liked)

Memes

45546 readers
694 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS