347
submitted 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) by raubarno@lemmy.ml to c/programmerhumor@lemmy.ml

Used all of these three. I don't want to even look at MS Visual C/C++ ecosystem.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 77 points 11 months ago

Why are clang and gcc the wrong way around?

[-] AapoL@sopuli.xyz 54 points 11 months ago

I'm a gcc user partly because of the optimization. I mean it's a pretty small difference. But still for scientific stuff gcc is slightly better I think. There's not much difference though and it basically comes to personal preference.

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 45 points 11 months ago

I am in full agreement. My comment was purely for spiciness. How dare you respond with rational and agreeable points. Good day sir!

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 1 points 11 months ago

every day i become less and less sure that i actually left reddit

[-] kale@lemmy.zip 3 points 11 months ago

I haven't dealt with HPC in a while, but Intel C compiler against MKL libraries were fastest CPU, and Nvidia CUDA was slightly easier to develop than OpenCL for other cards. I'm not sure if the situation's changed.

For my current applications, I use NumPy compiled against Intel MKV installed as a binary. It works great.

[-] AapoL@sopuli.xyz 2 points 11 months ago

For not that performance intensive stuff I would use clang though.

load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 11 Oct 2023
347 points (92.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

32050 readers
1608 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS