this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
807 points (100.0% liked)

196

16508 readers
2252 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

πŸ†˜

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] bappity@lemmy.world 120 points 1 year ago (11 children)

are they seriously still going ahead with this shit? Web Integrity API is the worst idea in existence

[–] finestnothing@lemmy.world 78 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If the web integrity API goes live and I can't use some sites because of it, it will be very nice to have a very clear filter on what websites are complete garbage for using it. Vivat librewolf + VPN!

[–] bappity@lemmy.world 64 points 1 year ago (6 children)

any websites that implement that API will never see me visit them ever again

[–] Serinus@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Probably Netflix, YouTube, and streaming apps first. I'd say banks, but banks are slow. Games won't take long. If there's not enough blowback it'll spread to every website that uses captchas today.

[–] CaptPretentious@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I feel like if a bank is going to use it, there needs to be a clear financial reason to. Because if someone can't access their account, they might lose their shit and leave for the first bank whose website works.

[–] Coasting0942@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

This is the reason that banks can’t even roll out MFA beyond a text message. Everybody uses a bank, less people use Netflix. The customer support headache if only 0.1% of people have to call in defeats any cost savings, and they already are ready to write off a lot of losses due to crime etc

[–] subcytoplasm@l.tta.wtf 1 points 1 year ago

Korean banks already require some pretty weird stuff. It's not common in the US at all, thankfully, but I can see them adopting it...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)