429
It's gone (discuss.tchncs.de)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 17 points 1 year ago

I'm not into Children, sorry.

[-] Tischkante@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago

Cartoons have missing features, so it leaves room for your own interpretation of it. Isn't it wonderful?

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago

But the features that are present are round faces, bangs in face, oversized sweater, wristbands, denim overalls, etc which all kind of allude to children's features and fashion. I'm not saying it was wrong to make this or post this, it's a cool image, I just feel no attraction to it and therefor the caption has comically failed.

[-] Khotetsu@lib.lgbt 5 points 1 year ago

I totally understand this, because we often attribute features that are either androgynous or culturally considered feminine (but especially androgynous features) with prepubescence. So you've got the rounded faces and lack of secondary sex characteristics that we would associate with older people, plus fashion that could easily be considered "younger," and despite probably being intended to be 20 or so, they look much younger.

As somebody who's got that scruffy white Jesus look going on but doesn't have a square jawline and often wears hoodies, I've more than once been mistaken for a high school/college student - even by high school students no less - despite being in my 30s. Being hit on by college kids almost 10 years younger than you is an awkward experience I would not wish on anyone. As is having your mom be mistaken for your grandmother.

[-] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago

YYEESSSS this one gets it

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2023
429 points (100.0% liked)

196

16420 readers
1934 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS