37
submitted 10 months ago by btaf45@lemmy.world to c/astronomy@mander.xyz
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

Right - that's what I'm saying. But this article seems to think that if you make a bicycle out of cars then you have a motorcycle.. Unless I'm not understanding it.

AFAIK gravity waves are ripples in actual space (mechanical waves) - not a property of "gravitons".

[-] Eufalconimorph@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 months ago

Gravitons are the name for the quanta of the (hypothetical) quantum gravitational field. They'd be the force carriers of the gravitational force in a theory of quantum gravity, if we had one.

Gravitational waves would still be physical waves like water waves, and they'd be composed of moving gravitons. Spacetime would likely be quantized instead of continuous; this becomes very hard to resolve since quantum mechanics needs to be reformulated to use discrete math instead of calculus, and we don't really know how to do that (non-uniform spacetime breaks QM).

[-] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 0 points 10 months ago

That's why I think the article is confused. They seem to think the gravity waves are a property of gravitons.

[-] btaf45@kbin.social 0 points 10 months ago

They seem to think the gravity waves are a property of gravitons.

The article talks about gravitational waves, not gravity waves. It is believed that gravitational radiation is similar to electromagnetic radiation. This would mean that gravitational waves are made up of particles called gravitons. But as the article says, we don't know that for sure because we haven't been able to detect gravitons yet.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Nov 2023
37 points (95.1% liked)

Astronomy

3876 readers
393 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS