78
submitted 11 months ago by NightOwl@lemm.ee to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] SiriusCybernetics@lemmy.ca -2 points 11 months ago

Wars should be consensual. If one side doesn’t want war then that should be that. If the other pursues the world should stop ‘em. Kinda like same principle as rape. Like sex is great. Rape not so much.

[-] rosymind@leminal.space 2 points 11 months ago

Seriously?

What nation goes: "Hey neighbor, you wanna kill a bunch of each other's soldiers and use a bunch of resources and pollute the earth? Maybe we can also kill some innocent babies while bombing hospitals for funsies?"

Wars are usually fought because one nation (or group) wants what the other has. If a side could get exactly what they want, there wouldn't be a war over it.

Wars are about taking: land, people, resources, revenge.

There's nothing consensual about it

[-] TotallyHuman@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

This would indeed result in no more war, at all. I fail to see the problem. (Besides that it wouldn't work, of course -- but it's a nice fantasy.)

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2023
78 points (95.3% liked)

World News

32291 readers
625 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS