this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2023
52 points (83.3% liked)

Programming

17528 readers
246 users here now

Welcome to the main community in programming.dev! Feel free to post anything relating to programming here!

Cross posting is strongly encouraged in the instance. If you feel your post or another person's post makes sense in another community cross post into it.

Hope you enjoy the instance!

Rules

Rules

  • Follow the programming.dev instance rules
  • Keep content related to programming in some way
  • If you're posting long videos try to add in some form of tldr for those who don't want to watch videos

Wormhole

Follow the wormhole through a path of communities !webdev@programming.dev



founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Github: https://github.com/nasser/---

Hello world:

‫(قول "مرحبا يا عالم!")
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] peter@feddit.uk 2 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] Cyno@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago (5 children)

It's a neutral, easily accessible language. Having it in programming could incentivize more people to learn it as well.

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

English has become the defacto lingua franca. I’d argue that Esperanto is less accessible than English, because barely anyone knowns it.

[–] senloke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Every book is not "accessible", when it's not even opened and willfully ignored of existing.

There is:

  • https://lernu.net
  • [https://esperanto12.net/en](Esperanto in 12 days)
  • [https://www.amazon.com/Complete-Esperanto-Learn-write-understand/dp/1473669189](Complete Esperanto)
  • [https://en.duolingo.com/course/eo/en/Learn-Esperanto](Duolingo Esperanto)

There are languages to which it's less accessible, but from the bigger ones, it's quiet accessible.

But if people don't open their eyes they don't see the forest in which they are standing.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)