this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
145 points (96.2% liked)
Open Source
31223 readers
292 users here now
All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!
Useful Links
- Open Source Initiative
- Free Software Foundation
- Electronic Frontier Foundation
- Software Freedom Conservancy
- It's FOSS
- Android FOSS Apps Megathread
Rules
- Posts must be relevant to the open source ideology
- No NSFW content
- No hate speech, bigotry, etc
Related Communities
- !libre_culture@lemmy.ml
- !libre_software@lemmy.ml
- !libre_hardware@lemmy.ml
- !linux@lemmy.ml
- !technology@lemmy.ml
Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
How are projects like this created?
This github repo is 6 months old, they already have 18+k stars and over 800 forks.
This looks like some overfunded pseudo-FOSS shit. Make the bare minimum open source and sell the rest to enterprises.
Why not take the money and really fund an existing project like kanboard or redmine?
I mean ffs kanboard is at least 10 years old and has less than 8k stars on github.
they look ugly. plane looks like linear which is a win in my book
With $4M you could round the edges and then some.
I think that open source people should also be able to recognize that always sponsoring a new project is not the open source way.
They could have given established software a facelift and added a lot more features and this would have been better for the open source world than what they did.
I mean it's not wrong what they did. They just shouldn't get as much praise for making it open source.
Imagine everyone creating their own versioning system because they don't like githubs frontend.
I have no problem with that if they offer something new to the space
Yes, but the only thing they add is enterprise addons. We don't need more of those.