this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
266 points (96.5% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
3 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe πŸ‡ͺπŸ‡Ί

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, πŸ‡©πŸ‡ͺ ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
poVoq@slrpnk.net
266
Wanted: 1m signatures for EU tax on super-rich (euobserver.com)
submitted 1 year ago by CAVOK@lemmy.world to c/europe@feddit.de
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Heringssalat@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

In reality, however, inequalities have persistently grown, to the point where today the richest 1% of the world's population own almost half of the global wealth and that same 1% also emit more CO2 than the poorest half of the planet.

Dumb argument for a tax in the EU.
If you earn 45000€ or more per year (post-tax) you are in the 1%. (According to this)
That sure is a nice wage, but it's definitely not rich and employees with a degree are not the people we should be taxing even more.

Also this:

The richest 1% of the planet own nearly half of all wealth. These same ultra-rich emit more CO2 than the poorest half of the planet.

So 45000€ is ultra-rich?

[–] 9bananas@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

the 1% the petition is talking about is global, as well as the ownership claims, and the CO2 pollution claim.

it's worded a bit oddly, but they want to tax the "global 1%", not (just) the "EU 1%".

as you pointed out, there's a pretty big difference between the two.

since the initiatives goals are largely about climate change, which is obviously a global problem in need of global solutions, this framing makes sense. it could have been written a bit clearer...

[–] Version@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

No. If you own 40.000€ per year, you are in the top 1% globally. So, β€žtaxing the rich 1%β€œ means not only taxing billionaires, but also average incomes in western countries.

Edit: Here you can check how rich you actually are: How rich am I?

[–] BuldgingVampire@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nice Website but its only checks your income. If you have to work for your money your not rich in a western country

[–] Version@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

What? Of course you are. You are not rich by western standards, but globally you are.

load more comments (5 replies)