this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2023
982 points (99.0% liked)

linuxmemes

21222 readers
73 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] RustyNova@lemmy.world 53 points 11 months ago (23 children)

    Can a linux/systemd nerd explain what the error is? I know it's a shutdown sequence, but I'm curious on the fault

    [–] earthquake@lemm.ee 50 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    These kinds of public errors are almost always a hard drive failure.

    [–] CmdrKeen@lemmy.today 11 points 11 months ago (6 children)

    Using an actual hard drive for an embedded system like this would be a failure in and of itself.

    Unless it literally has to store several hours' worth of HD video content, no reason the entire system couldn't fit on an SD card.

    [–] constantokra@lemmy.one 31 points 11 months ago

    It's been my experience that SD cards are almost always what causes a failure on a SBC. Given the cost of the screens, i'd probably choose something that could boot off nvme storage. Or at least tape a new, configured SD card to the case of the SBC for when this inevitably happens.

    [–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 21 points 11 months ago

    An SD card is MUCH less reliable than a good hdd unless it's read only.

    [–] dublet@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

    As someone who works on embedded devices: HDDs are used for media storage and can be easily replaced. Any NAND as a limited life span and good embedded software will try very hard to minimise writes. Though in my particular area, there's additional security constraints on the OS, which preclude any removable flash storage from being used.

    [–] Cqrd@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 11 months ago

    They probably expect the signage to change a lot and don't want a hardware failure when they do it too much, or didn't use an external drive in this case and the SD card failed because they wrote to it too much (which would happen eventually anyway).

    [–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Even better: Three SD cards with a ZFS mirror and failure notifications

    [–] CmdrKeen@lemmy.today 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

    Bah humbug, just hook it up to the cloud, WCGW?

    [–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

    You don't need an internet connection for failure notifications

    [–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 11 months ago

    Using an actual hard drive for an embedded system like this would be a failure in and of itself.

    You may be surprised to learn that these stores use machines that are occasionally more than a year old and also use inexpensive tech like enterprise spinny disk.

    A spinny disk will work in this space, and you know they'll be deciding based on cost.

    load more comments (21 replies)