this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2023
62 points (93.1% liked)

Science Memes

11081 readers
3290 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Haus@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You can't multiply both sides by dx in much the same way you can't differentiate a duck. That said, even pure mathematicians sort of think of it that way as a useful shorthand.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Can't you just use infinitesimals and then actually multiply them? It never results in an invalid operation with the normal dx, only the one with the fancy d (forgive my lack of terminology knowledge)

[–] Haus@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

In (d/dx)f(x), d/dx is a symbol that means the derivative of f with respect to x. It's not a division of two variables. But, the reason the symbol is useful is that you sort of can multiply the dx in some situations.

[–] Feathercrown@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I understand that it's a symbol, not a fraction, and that the top and bottom are linked and not separable. But, you can also use an equivalent infintesimal fraction dy/dx with the actual infintesimal values dy and dx being manipulatable. If I'm wrong, you'll be able to find an example that doesn't work (without using partial derivatives-- those actually can't be cancelled).