Just gonna say for the record that, neither China nor Russia are socialist countries, actually China is more neoliberalist than USA right now, and Russia is an oligarhchy. China is pretty much applying all the steps written in the book of imperialism in order to replace america.

Furthermore, both countries are highly autoritarian. Let's not make them the good boys of this story. Canada is a highly hypocrite country that was built on genocide and keeps supporting expansionist countries such as Israel.

[+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (4 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] lorabe@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago (1 children)

Not gonna watch the video right now, but China fulfills every category to be an imperialist country.

They are expansionist by nature, claiming Taiwan, they use their money to extend their influence, the so called soft power, they lend money to weak countries that want to develop infrastructure with the condition that if they don't pay the money china gets the infrastructure. That is an aggressive expansionist activity.

[+] TheAnonymouseJoker@lemmy.ml -2 points 3 years ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

[removed by mod]

[–] lorabe@lemmy.ml 0 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 children)

Yep, sounds like it. Backfire theory. Learn about imperialism, capitalism and socialism first before making such uneducated comments.

I wonder how downplaying my figure makes my points less valid.

Buddy, Taiwan is a separatist region, not a country. For a state to be a country, it has to be a de jure sovereignty. Taiwan is a de facto state.

You really have to check again what "de jure" and what "de facto" means. Taiwan pretty much enters in the category of a "de jure" state, since it doesn't force it's citizens to recognize the Taiwanese law by authoritarian means. Furthermore elections are a given and so far there are no fraud concerns.

Ever heard Taiwan declaring independence, or being recognised as a country by a majority of countries in UN, let alone just 15 countries?

This is so close to be a compelling argument to use against the existence of Palestina as an estate, it's funny how inconsistent some people can get just to justify Chinese expansionist policy over Taiwan.

load more comments (2 replies)