this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
529 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59223 readers
3179 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] LWD@lemm.ee 17 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (6 children)
[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 35 points 9 months ago (5 children)

People say that, but...

I had a Canon Pixma ip5000 back in the day that had ink cartridges with no electronics in them. For ink level sensing there was an LED and photodiode built into the carriage that the cartridges went into, in the printer itself. Not in the cartridges. They were transparent plastic, so the machine could just shine through and determine when ink was running low. For its usage gauge, it just calculated it based on print output vs. the volume of a new cartridge, assuming you put a full cartridge into it when you told it so. Yes, this meant you could also fool it by telling it you'd installed a new cartridge when you hadn't, but it would still figure it out right away if you put a truly empty one in.

And this worked just fine. No problems at all with that system. I used and abused that printer for years, doing volume printing for work with it (it could do 8.5x11 borderless!) until it just plain wore out. Probably after hundreds of thousands of pages.

So no, I really don't think having chips running arbitrary code in a goddamn ink cartridge is actually necessary in any way.

[–] bstix@feddit.dk 13 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (4 children)

Crazy idea here: How about not monitoring the ink at all?

Why does the printer need to know? It's not like it's going to explode from not having fresh ink anyway. Just put the ink in a visible container where the user can look and see if it being empty is the cause of a shitty print.

I'd buy any printer that doesn't attempt to monitor the ink.

[–] jay9@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago

Actually with some print heads they will be damaged if there is no ink

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)